142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36621812)
21. Assessment of beam-matched linacs quality/accuracy for interchanging SBRT or SRT patient using VMAT without replanning.
Xu Z; Warrell G; Lee S; Colussi V; Zheng Y; Ellis R; Machtay M; Podder T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 30402983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.
Lam D; Zhang X; Li H; Deshan Y; Schott B; Zhao T; Zhang W; Mutic S; Sun B
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4666-4675. PubMed ID: 31386761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pixel response-based EPID dosimetry for patient specific QA.
Han B; Ding A; Lu M; Xing L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 28291939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monte Carlo modeling of HD120 multileaf collimator on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator for verification of 6X and 6X FFF VMAT SABR treatment plans.
Bergman AM; Gete E; Duzenli C; Teke T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4686. PubMed ID: 24892341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a "Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-megavoltage photon and electron beams".
Jacqmin DJ; Bredfeldt JS; Frigo SP; Smilowitz JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28291929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simplified sigmoidal curve fitting for a 6 MV FFF photon beam of the Halcyon to determine the field size for beam commissioning and quality assurance.
Choi MG; Law M; Yoon DK; Tamura M; Matsumoto K; Otsuka M; Kim MS; Djeng SK; Monzen H; Suh TS
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Dec; 15(1):273. PubMed ID: 33287828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics of flattening filter free beams at low monitor unit settings.
Akino Y; Ota S; Inoue S; Mizuno H; Sumida I; Yoshioka Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112101. PubMed ID: 24320454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated and robust beam data validation of a preconfigured ring gantry linear accelerator using a 1D tank with synchronized beam delivery and couch motions.
Knutson NC; Schmidt MC; Reynoso FJ; Hao Y; Mazur TR; Laugeman E; Hugo G; Mutic S; Li HH; Ngwa W; Cai B; Sajo E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):200-207. PubMed ID: 32614511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of an aSi-EPID with flattening filter free beams: applicability to the GLAaS algorithm for portal dosimetry and first experience for pretreatment QA of RapidArc.
Nicolini G; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Fenoglietto P; Cozzi L; Fogliata A
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111719. PubMed ID: 24320427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests.
Krauss RF; Balik S; Cirino ET; Hadley A; Hariharan N; Holmes SM; Kielar K; Lavvafi H; McCullough K; Palefsky S; Sawyer JP; Smith K; Tracy J; Winter JD; Wingreen NE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 24(11):e14160. PubMed ID: 37793084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Commissioning of a Versa HD
Laub WU; Merz B; Kishore M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):72-85. PubMed ID: 33619852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a virtual source model for Monte Carlo dose calculations of a flattening filter free linac.
Cashmore J; Golubev S; Dumont JL; Sikora M; Alber M; Ramtohul M
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3262-9. PubMed ID: 22755709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo simulation using PRIMO code as a tool for checking the credibility of commissioning and quality assurance of 6 MV TrueBeam STx varian LINAC.
Efendi MA; Funsian A; Chittrakarn T; Bhongsuwan T
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2020; 25(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 31920464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dosimetric evaluation of a treatment planning system using the AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) validation tests.
Yousif YAM; Zifodya J
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1341-1353. PubMed ID: 36352316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of a commercial ion chamber detector array for the measurement of high spatial-resolution photon beam profiles.
Karimnia V; Belley MD; Rodgers R; Price M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):323-331. PubMed ID: 30284378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Efficient Commissioning of the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System with the Golden Beam Data].
Hiroki T; Fujita Y; Maehira S; Soda K; Kikuchi T; Kunieda E
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(8):725-735. PubMed ID: 31434844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic commissioning of a GPU-based Monte Carlo radiation dose calculation code for photon radiotherapy.
Tian Z; Graves YJ; Jia X; Jiang SB
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6467-86. PubMed ID: 25295381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels.
Nelms BE; Chan MF; Jarry G; Lemire M; Lowden J; Hampton C; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111722. PubMed ID: 24320430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization and evaluation of an integrated quality monitoring system for online quality assurance of external beam radiation therapy.
Hoffman D; Chung E; Hess C; Stern R; Benedict S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28291937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.
Huang Y; Pi Y; Ma K; Miao X; Fu S; Zhu Z; Cheng Y; Zhang Z; Chen H; Wang H; Gu H; Shao Y; Duan Y; Feng A; Zhuo W; Xu Z
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221104881. PubMed ID: 35726209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
