157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36622563)
21. Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Omiya Y; Onishi H
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 33462645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Texture Analysis in the Diagnosis of Primary Breast Cancer: Comparison of High-Resolution Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography (dbPET) and Whole-Body PET/CT.
Satoh Y; Hirata K; Tamada D; Funayama S; Onishi H
Front Med (Lausanne); 2020; 7():603303. PubMed ID: 33425949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT.
Nishimatsu K; Nakamoto Y; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():138-145. PubMed ID: 28583624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in the detection of small and low-grade breast cancer.
Sueoka S; Sasada S; Masumoto N; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 33484374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantifying and reducing the effect of calibration error on variability of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements.
Lockhart CM; MacDonald LR; Alessio AM; McDougald WA; Doot RK; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 21233174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II.
MacDonald L; Edwards J; Lewellen T; Haseley D; Rogers J; Kinahan P
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1666-75. PubMed ID: 19759118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size.
Eo JS; Chun IK; Paeng JC; Kang KW; Lee SM; Han W; Noh DY; Chung JK; Lee DS
Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21871801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Attenuation correction of a flat table top for radiation therapy in hybrid PET/MR using CT- and
Witoszynskyj S; Andrzejewski P; Georg D; Hacker M; Nyholm T; Rausch I; Knäusl B
Phys Med; 2019 Sep; 65():76-83. PubMed ID: 31437602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Instrumentation for Positron Emission Mammography.
Thompson CJ
PET Clin; 2006 Jan; 1(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27156957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Quality control of dose calibrator using a traceable syringe-type (68)Ge/(68)Ga calibration source].
Miyaji N; Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Umeda T; Murata T; Takiguchi T; Koizumi M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 24366558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimal relaxation parameters of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm and post-smoothing filter for image reconstruction of dedicated breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Hirata K; Asakawa Y; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 33772738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-rigid registration of serial dedicated breast CT, longitudinal dedicated breast CT and PET/CT images using the diffeomorphic demons method.
Santos J; Chaudhari AJ; Joshi AA; Ferrero A; Yang K; Boone JM; Badawi RD
Phys Med; 2014 Sep; 30(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 25022452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of spatial dependence of point spread function-based PET reconstruction using a traceable point-like
Murata T; Miwa K; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Hasegawa T; Oda K; Umeda T; Iimori T; Masuda Y; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
EJNMMI Phys; 2016 Dec; 3(1):26. PubMed ID: 27783373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification with a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.
Bowen SL; Ferrero A; Badawi RD
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2694-707. PubMed ID: 22559640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.
Satoh Y; Hanaoka K; Ikegawa C; Imai M; Watanabe S; Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Onishi H; Ito T; Komoike Y; Ishii K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system.
Raylmana RR; Smith MF; Kinahan PE; Majewski S
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4989-97. PubMed ID: 19070233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.
Raylman RR; Van Kampen W; Stolin AV; Gong W; Jaliparthi G; Martone PF; Smith MF; Sarment D; Clinthorne NH; Perna M
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 29389017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.
Shkumat NA; Springer A; Walker CM; Rohren EM; Yang WT; Adrada BE; Arribas E; Carkaci S; Chuang HH; Santiago L; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5176-85. PubMed ID: 21978062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
