These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36622721)

  • 1. Fine-tuning the standard setting of objective structured practical examinations in clinical anatomy.
    Dissabandara LO; Nawaratna S; Nirthanan S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2023; 16(3):486-496. PubMed ID: 36622721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tablet-assisted objective structured spotter practical examination (TOSSPE): Advantages of an innovative anatomy spotter examination method for medical student assessment.
    Polak K; Gielecki JS; Żurada A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Nov; 15(6):1060-1073. PubMed ID: 34382355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated grading of anatomical objective structured practical examinations using decision trees: An artificial intelligence approach.
    Bernard J; Sonnadara R; Saraco AN; Mitchell JP; Bak AB; Bayer I; Wainman BC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(5):967-978. PubMed ID: 37322819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is an objective structured practical examination in anatomy?
    Yaqinuddin A; Zafar M; Ikram MF; Ganguly P
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22930456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today.
    Smith CF; McManus B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 24706567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure to Repeated Mini-objective Structured Practical Examinations as A Formative Assessment Tool to the Students and Faculty in Physiology Practicals.
    Avadhany SD; Avadhany ST
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2016; 60(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 29957903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The practical examination types (spot test and slide test) of gross anatomy course in faculty of medicine: a simultaneous evaluation of the aspect of student success.
    Özen KE; Erdoğan K; Yarar B; Çizmeci G; Ay Keselik G; Elmalı F; Malas MA
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):505-513. PubMed ID: 33687489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participation in Dissection Affects Student Performance on Gross Anatomy Practical and Written Examinations: Results of a Four-Year Comparative Study.
    Thompson AR; Marshall AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jan; 13(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30661304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
    Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The anatomy competence score: a new marker for anatomical ability.
    Schoeman S; Chandratilake M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22127894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.
    Sadeesh T; Prabavathy G; Ganapathy A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):531-535. PubMed ID: 33386929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher-Order Assessment in Gross Anatomy: A Comparison of Performance on Higher- Versus Lower-Order Anatomy Questions between Undergraduate and First-Year Medical Students.
    Thompson AR; Giffin BF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):306-316. PubMed ID: 33113274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of incorporating normative data into a criterion-referenced standard setting in medical education.
    Cusimano MD; Rothman AI
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S88-90. PubMed ID: 14557106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
    Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The weak relationship between anatomy competence and clinical skills in junior medical students.
    Schoeman S; Chandratilake M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 22467202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.