279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36623403)
1. Ex vivo bovine liver nonlinear viscoelastic properties: MR elastography and rheological measurements.
Jugé L; Foley P; Hatt A; Yeung J; Bilston LE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Feb; 138():105638. PubMed ID: 36623403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.
Klatt D; Friedrich C; Korth Y; Vogt R; Braun J; Sack I
Biorheology; 2010; 47(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 20683156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strain-dependent shear properties of human adipose tissue in vivo.
Hatt A; Lloyd R; Bolsterlee B; Bilston LE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105924. PubMed ID: 37276651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using static preload with magnetic resonance elastography to estimate large strain viscoelastic properties of bovine liver.
Clarke EC; Cheng S; Green M; Sinkus R; Bilston LE
J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(13):2461-5. PubMed ID: 21762921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Viscoelastic properties of normal rat liver measured by ultrasound elastography: Comparison with oscillatory rheometry.
Lin H; Shen Y; Chen X; Zhu Y; Zheng Y; Zhang X; Guo Y; Wang T; Chen S
Biorheology; 2016; 53(5-6):193-207. PubMed ID: 27858670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.
Poul SS; Ormachea J; Ge GR; Parker KJ
Acta Biomater; 2022 Jul; 146():259-273. PubMed ID: 35525481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of normal compression on the shear modulus of soft tissue in rheological measurements.
Ayyildiz M; Cinoglu S; Basdogan C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():235-43. PubMed ID: 26042768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography.
Atay SM; Kroenke CD; Sabet A; Bayly PV
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021013. PubMed ID: 18412500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fractal network dimension and viscoelastic powerlaw behavior: I. A modeling approach based on a coarse-graining procedure combined with shear oscillatory rheometry.
Posnansky O; Guo J; Hirsch S; Papazoglou S; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):4023-40. PubMed ID: 22674184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A compact 0.5 T MR elastography device and its application for studying viscoelasticity changes in biological tissues during progressive formalin fixation.
Braun J; Tzschätzsch H; Körting C; Ariza de Schellenberger A; Jenderka M; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):470-478. PubMed ID: 28321914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():132-43. PubMed ID: 24769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterisation of the soft tissue viscous and elastic properties using ultrasound elastography and rheological models: validation and applications in plantar soft tissue assessment.
Tecse A; Romero SE; Naemi R; Castaneda B
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 36996846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.
Vappou J; Breton E; Choquet P; Goetz C; Willinger R; Constantinesco A
MAGMA; 2007 Dec; 20(5-6):273-8. PubMed ID: 18080819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo thigh muscles measured by MR elastography.
Chakouch MK; Pouletaut P; Charleux F; Bensamoun SF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1423-33. PubMed ID: 26605873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wideband MRE and static mechanical indentation of human liver specimen: sensitivity of viscoelastic constants to the alteration of tissue structure in hepatic fibrosis.
Reiter R; Freise C; Jöhrens K; Kamphues C; Seehofer D; Stockmann M; Somasundaram R; Asbach P; Braun J; Samani A; Sack I
J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1665-74. PubMed ID: 24657103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of viscoelastic property characterization of plastisol phantoms with magnetic resonance elastography and high-frequency rheometry.
Lefebvre PM; Koon KT; Brusseau E; Nicolle S; Palieme JF; Lambert SA; Grenier D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1216-1219. PubMed ID: 28268544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractal network dimension and viscoelastic powerlaw behavior: II. An experimental study of structure-mimicking phantoms by magnetic resonance elastography.
Guo J; Posnansky O; Hirsch S; Scheel M; Taupitz M; Braun J; Sack I
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):4041-53. PubMed ID: 22674199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation.
Garteiser P; Doblas S; Daire JL; Wagner M; Leitao H; Vilgrain V; Sinkus R; Van Beers BE
Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2169-77. PubMed ID: 22572989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tabletop magnetic resonance elastography for the measurement of viscoelastic parameters of small tissue samples.
Ipek-Ugay S; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Guo J; Hirsch S; Sack I; Braun J
J Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 251():13-8. PubMed ID: 25554945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nucleus pulposus structure and function assessed in shear using magnetic resonance elastography, quantitative MRI, and rheometry.
Co M; Raterman B; Klamer B; Kolipaka A; Walter B
JOR Spine; 2024 Jun; 7(2):e1335. PubMed ID: 38741919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
