166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36624021)
1. Prediction of Clinical Molecular Typing of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using
Zhang J; Liu Y; Fan H; Wang W; Shao W; Cao G; Shi X
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S82-S92. PubMed ID: 36624021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer Using Dual-Phase FDG PET/CT.
Sasada S; Masumoto N; Kimura Y; Kajitani K; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):1129-1135. PubMed ID: 31339353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of biological characteristics of breast cancer using dual-phase FDG PET/CT.
Sasada S; Masumoto N; Suzuki E; Sueoka S; Goda N; Kajitani K; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Apr; 46(4):831-837. PubMed ID: 30648199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of standardized uptake value measurements of the primary lesions in proven cases of breast carcinoma with different degree of disease burden at diagnosis: does 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography predict tumor biology?
Basu S; Mavi A; Cermik T; Houseni M; Alavi A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2008; 10(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18000713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging... Potential tool for diagnosis of breast cancer.
Zytoon AA; Murakami K; El-Kholy MR; El-Shorbagy E
Clin Radiol; 2008 Nov; 63(11):1213-27. PubMed ID: 18929039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a pilot study.
Lee JK; Min KJ; So KA; Kim S; Hong JH
J Ovarian Res; 2014 Feb; 7():15. PubMed ID: 24499648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined
Wu J; Zhang X; Jia Z; Zhou X; Qi R; Ji H; Sun J; Sun C; Teng Z; Lu G; Chen X
Mol Pharm; 2022 Sep; 19(9):3405-3411. PubMed ID: 35972444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
Choi WH; Yoo IR; O JH; Kim SH; Chung SK
Br J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 84(1003):593-9. PubMed ID: 21081574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-phase FDG PET/CT for predicting prognosis in operable breast cancer.
Ikejiri H; Sasada S; Emi A; Masumoto N; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast; 2022 Oct; 65():98-103. PubMed ID: 35921799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual time point
Yamagishi Y; Koiwai T; Yamasaki T; Einama T; Fukumura M; Hiratsuka M; Kono T; Hayashi K; Ishida J; Ueno H; Tsuda H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1146. PubMed ID: 31775675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive Value of
Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):2174-2181. PubMed ID: 28432480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of preoperative
Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Journal Club: Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in predicting the clinicopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Sugie T; Mikami Y; Toi M; Togashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 25055259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of
Yamagishi Y; Yamasaki T; Ishida J; Moriya T; Einama T; Koiwai T; Fukumura-Koga M; Kono T; Hayashi K; Ueno H; Yamamoto J; Tsuda H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 27(8):2698-2710. PubMed ID: 32124121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combination of breast imaging parameters obtained from
Grapin M; Coutant C; Riedinger JM; Ladoire S; Brunotte F; Cochet A; Humbert O
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():81-88. PubMed ID: 30927964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
