These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3662507)

  • 1. Comparison of media for recovery of total coliform bacteria from chemically treated water.
    Rice EW; Fox KR; Nash HD; Read EJ; Smith AP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jul; 53(7):1571-3. PubMed ID: 3662507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique.
    Evans TM; Seidler RJ; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 May; 41(5):1144-51. PubMed ID: 7020591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water.
    LeChevallier MW; Cameron SC; McFeters GA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 45(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 6338827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of m-Endo LES, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water.
    Grabow WO; du Preez M
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 38(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 394678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elimination of overgrowth in delayed-incubation membrane filter test for total coliforms by m-ST holding medium.
    Chen M; Hickey PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 52(4):778-81. PubMed ID: 3777926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of factors affecting the membrane filter technique for testing drinking water.
    Hsu SC; Williams TJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 44(2):453-60. PubMed ID: 6751233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.
    Fricker CR; Eldred BJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 19874482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Injured coliforms in drinking water.
    McFeters GA; Kippin JS; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 51(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3513698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [MUG-lauryl sulfate bouillon--an optimal medium for the detection of total coliforms and fecal coliform bacteria in relation to hygienic evaluation of bathing waters according to the European Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
    Schindler PR
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Apr; 191(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 1872943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparison of BRILA-MUG and lauryl sulfate-MUG bouillon as detection media for total and fecal coliform bacteria in bathing waters in conformity with the Economic Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
    Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Holländer R; Köppe FG; von Pritzbuer E
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1993 Nov; 195(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8117394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False positive fecal coliform in biosolid samples assayed using A-1 medium.
    Baker KH; Redmond B; Herson DS
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16121511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of verification procedures for the membrane filter total coliform technique.
    LeChevallier MW; Cameron SC; McFeters GA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 45(3):1126-8. PubMed ID: 6342533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two media and different plating techniques for enumeration of thermotolerant coliforms in river water.
    Tamagnini LM; González RD
    Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 2001; 43(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 17061492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods for determining the numbers and species distribution of coliform bacteria in well water samples.
    Niemi RM; Heikkilä MP; Lahti K; Kalso S; Niemelä SI
    J Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 90(6):850-8. PubMed ID: 11412314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
    Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative performance of Colisure.
    McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved membrane filtration method incorporating catalase and sodium pyruvate for detection of chlorine-stressed coliform bacteria.
    Calabrese JP; Bissonnette GK
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1990 Nov; 56(11):3558-64. PubMed ID: 2268162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fluorogenic and conventional membrane filter media for enumerating coliform bacteria.
    Cenci G; De Bartolomeo A; Caldini G
    Microbios; 1993; 76(306):47-54. PubMed ID: 8264433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underestimation of total-coliform counts by the membrane filter verification procedure.
    Standridge JH; Delfino JJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 44(4):1001-3. PubMed ID: 7149709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of confirmatory media for coliform organisms and Escherichia coli in water. By a joint committee of the Public Health Laboratory Service and the Standing Committee of Analysts.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Dec; 87(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 7031125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.