These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36625374)

  • 1. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.
    Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
    Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
    Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides.
    Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
    Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of surgical guides manufactured with four different 3D printers. A comparative in vitro study.
    Morón-Conejo B; Berrendero S; Salido MP; Zarauz C; Pradíes G
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105226. PubMed ID: 38971459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
    Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
    Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
    Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers.
    Bennett GW; Kim SK
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer vs. High-End 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery-An In Vitro Accuracy Assessment Study of Different 3D Printing Technologies.
    Wegmüller L; Halbeisen F; Sharma N; Kühl S; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
    Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Two 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery.
    Sommacal B; Savic M; Filippi A; Kühl S; Thieringer FM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):743–746. PubMed ID: 29543930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The three-dimensional stability and accuracy of 3D printing surgical templates: An In Vitro study.
    Lan D; Luo Y; Qu Y; Man Y
    J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104936. PubMed ID: 38492806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
    Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.