BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36625552)

  • 1. Quantitative bias analysis of prevalence under misclassification: evaluation indicators, calculation method and case analysis.
    Liu J; Wang S; Shao F
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 52(3):942-951. PubMed ID: 36625552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of quantitative bias analysis applied to epidemiological research.
    Petersen JM; Ranker LR; Barnard-Mayers R; MacLehose RF; Fox MP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1708-1730. PubMed ID: 33880532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved Correction of Misclassification Bias With Bootstrap Imputation.
    van Walraven C
    Med Care; 2018 Jul; 56(7):e39-e45. PubMed ID: 28787347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias from outcome misclassification in immunization schedule safety research.
    Newcomer SR; Kulldorff M; Xu S; Daley MF; Fireman B; Lewis E; Glanz JM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Feb; 27(2):221-228. PubMed ID: 29292551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SAS and R code for probabilistic quantitative bias analysis for misclassified binary variables and binary unmeasured confounders.
    Fox MP; MacLehose RF; Lash TL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 37141446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misclassification of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance Estimates: Is Considering the Positive Predictive Value Enough?
    Labgold K; Collin LJ; Howards PP
    Epidemiology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 34799470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of quantitative bias analysis to evaluate single-arm trials with real-world data external controls.
    Gray C; Ralphs E; Fox MP; Lash TL; Liu G; Kou TD; Rivera DR; Bosco J; Braun KVN; Grimson F; Layton D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2024 May; 33(5):e5796. PubMed ID: 38680093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misclassification of outcome in case-control studies: Methods for sensitivity analysis.
    Gilbert R; Martin RM; Donovan J; Lane JA; Hamdy F; Neal DE; Metcalfe C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2377-2393. PubMed ID: 25217446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of misclassification error in the estimation of maternal major depression disorder prevalence in home visitation programs.
    Owora AH; Carabin H
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Mar; 261():80-87. PubMed ID: 29289025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection and Misclassification Biases in Longitudinal Studies.
    Haine D; Dohoo I; Dufour S
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():99. PubMed ID: 29892604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
    Corbin M; Haslett S; Pearce N; Maule M; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 46(3):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28338966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining self-reported and objectively measured survey data to improve hypertension prevalence estimates: Portuguese experience.
    Kislaya I; Leite A; Perelman J; Machado A; Torres AR; Tolonen H; Nunes B
    Arch Public Health; 2021 Apr; 79(1):45. PubMed ID: 33827693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A primer on quantitative bias analysis with positive predictive values in research using electronic health data.
    Newcomer SR; Xu S; Kulldorff M; Daley MF; Fireman B; Glanz JM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1664-1674. PubMed ID: 31365086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obtaining Prevalence Estimates of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Model to Inform Decision-Making.
    Sahlu I; Whittaker AB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 33831172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of misclassification of antiretroviral treatment status on the prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance.
    Castro H; Pillay D; Sabin C; Dunn DT;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Mar; 12():30. PubMed ID: 22416878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.
    Blair A; Stewart P; Lubin JH; Forastiere F
    Am J Ind Med; 2007 Mar; 50(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 17096363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of methods to correct for misclassification bias from administrative database diagnostic codes.
    Walraven CV
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):605-616. PubMed ID: 29253160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corrected ROC analysis for misclassified binary outcomes.
    Zawistowski M; Sussman JB; Hofer TP; Bentley D; Hayward RA; Wiitala WL
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28245528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.