These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36626414)

  • 1. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by dynamic preload parameters in children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation - A prospective observational study.
    Xie S; Han D; Chen G; Pan S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(49):e31795. PubMed ID: 36626414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery.
    Jeong DM; Ahn HJ; Park HW; Yang M; Kim JA; Park J
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1158-1165. PubMed ID: 28504996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance predict fluid responsiveness even in thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a prospective observational study.
    Hikasa Y; Suzuki S; Tanabe S; Noma K; Shirakawa Y; Fujiwara T; Morimatsu H
    J Anesth; 2023 Dec; 37(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 37731141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
    Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation.
    Fu Q; Duan M; Zhao F; Mi W
    Drug Discov Ther; 2015 Aug; 9(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 26370528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
    Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
    Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
    Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.
    Cheng YW; Xu F; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12289. PubMed ID: 30278500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation study of the dynamic parameters of pulse wave in pulmonary resection surgery.
    Miñana A; Parra MJ; Carbonell J; Soro M; Belda J; Ferrando C
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2020 Feb; 67(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 31889529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
    Kim KM; Gwak MS; Choi SJ; Kim MH; Park MH; Heo BY
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2013 Sep; 65(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 24101958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
    Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic Changes via the Lung Recruitment Maneuver Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure During One-Lung Ventilation.
    Kimura A; Suehiro K; Juri T; Fujimoto Y; Yoshida H; Tanaka K; Mori T; Nishikawa K
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 133(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 33687175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.
    Fu Q; Zhao F; Mi W; Zhang H
    Biosci Trends; 2014 Feb; 8(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24647114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Noninvasive Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness Among Different Ventilation Modes in Dogs Recovering from Experimental Cardiac Surgery.
    Sasaki K; Mutoh T; Yamamoto S; Taki Y; Kawashima R
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7736-7741. PubMed ID: 30372425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using dynamic preload indices in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery with pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position.
    Chin JH; Lee EH; Hwang GS; Choi WJ
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2013 Jul; 41(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 23808512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Wu M; Dai Z; Liang Y; Liu X; Zheng X; Zhang W; Bo J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37932674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.