184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36626819)
1. Can we explain machine learning-based prediction for rupture status assessments of intracranial aneurysms?
Mu N; Rezaeitaleshmahalleh M; Lyu Z; Wang M; Tang J; Strother CM; Gemmete JJ; Pandey AS; Jiang J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36626819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
Paliwal N; Jaiswal P; Tutino VM; Shallwani H; Davies JM; Siddiqui AH; Rai R; Meng H
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E7. PubMed ID: 30453461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study.
Chen G; Lu M; Shi Z; Xia S; Ren Y; Liu Z; Liu X; Li Z; Mao L; Li XL; Zhang B; Zhang LJ; Lu GM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5170-5182. PubMed ID: 32350658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretable machine learning model to predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms and facilitate clinical decision.
Xiong W; Chen T; Li J; Xiang L; Zhang C; Xiang L; Li Y; Chu D; Wu Y; Jie Q; Qiu R; Xu Z; Zou J; Fan H; Zhao Z
Neurol Sci; 2022 Nov; 43(11):6371-6379. PubMed ID: 35997829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of prediction models for one-year brain tumour survival using machine learning: a comparison of accuracy and interpretability.
Charlton CE; Poon MTC; Brennan PM; Fleuriot JD
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107482. PubMed ID: 36947980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation on explainable machine learning models to predict chronic kidney diseases.
Ghosh SK; Khandoker AH
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3687. PubMed ID: 38355876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of statistical learning approaches for cerebral aneurysm rupture assessment.
Detmer FJ; Lückehe D; Mut F; Slawski M; Hirsch S; Bijlenga P; von Voigt G; Cebral JR
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Jan; 15(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 31485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Explainable machine learning in outcome prediction of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Shu L; Yan H; Wu Y; Yan T; Yang L; Zhang S; Chen Z; Liao Q; Yang L; Xiao B; Ye M; Lv S; Wu M; Zhu X; Hu P
Aging (Albany NY); 2024 Mar; 16(5):4654-4669. PubMed ID: 38431285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.
Wang J; Chen H; Wang H; Liu W; Peng D; Zhao Q; Xiao M
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e43815. PubMed ID: 37023416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and assessment of machine learning models for predicting recurrence risk after endovascular treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms.
Lin S; Zou Y; Hu J; Xiang L; Guo L; Lin X; Zou D; Gao X; Liang H; Zou J; Zhao Z; Dai X
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Apr; 45(2):1521-1531. PubMed ID: 34657975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.
Chen X; Pan J; Li Y; Tang R
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Nov; 35(11):2643-2656. PubMed ID: 37733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rupture Risk Assessment for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Interpretable Machine Learning on Multidimensional Data.
Ou C; Liu J; Qian Y; Chong W; Zhang X; Liu W; Su H; Zhang N; Zhang J; Duan CZ; He X
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():570181. PubMed ID: 33424738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer recurrence risk.
Zuo D; Yang L; Jin Y; Qi H; Liu Y; Ren L
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38031071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Integrated Model Combining Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.
Chen R; Mo X; Chen Z; Feng P; Li H
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():868395. PubMed ID: 35645962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Machine Learning Based on Clinical and Morphological Features.
Zhu W; Li W; Tian Z; Zhang Y; Wang K; Zhang Y; Liu J; Yang X
Transl Stroke Res; 2020 Dec; 11(6):1287-1295. PubMed ID: 32430796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supervised learning applied to classifying fallers versus non-fallers among older adults with cancer.
Ramsdale E; Kunduru M; Smith L; Culakova E; Shen J; Meng S; Zand M; Anand A
J Geriatr Oncol; 2023 May; 14(4):101498. PubMed ID: 37084629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer.
Sorayaie Azar A; Babaei Rikan S; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi M; Wiil UK
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Dec; 22(1):345. PubMed ID: 36585641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Identification Using Different Machine Learning Algorithms and Radiomics.
Yang B; Li W; Wu X; Zhong W; Wang J; Zhou Y; Huang T; Zhou L; Zhou Z
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(16):. PubMed ID: 37627886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.
Ye Z; An S; Gao Y; Xie E; Zhao X; Guo Z; Li Y; Shen N; Ren J; Zheng J
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Jan; 28(1):33. PubMed ID: 36653875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning.
Tseng PY; Chen YT; Wang CH; Chiu KM; Peng YS; Hsu SP; Chen KL; Yang CY; Lee OK
Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):478. PubMed ID: 32736589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
