These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36627551)

  • 41. A comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video-laryngoscopes to the Miller blade for successfully intubating manikins simulating normal and difficult pediatric airways.
    Hippard HK; Kalyani G; Olutoye OA; Mann DG; Watcha MF
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 26(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 27083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Babb M; Mann S
    Anaesthesia; 2002 Mar; 57(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 11892640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mechanical testing of the deflection and ultimate strength of metal and plastic disposable laryngoscope blades.
    Pullela RP; Brousseau PA; Valliant EM; Milne AD
    Can J Anaesth; 2022 Mar; 69(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 34910288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. User satisfaction and forces generated during laryngoscopy using disposable Miller blades: a manikin study.
    Sudhir G; Wilkes AR; Clyburn P; Aguilera I; Hall JE
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):1056-60. PubMed ID: 17845659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation.
    Legrand MA; Steinmann D; Priebe HJ; Mols G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):343-50. PubMed ID: 22569030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Airway management for tonsillectomy: a national survey of UK practice.
    Clarke MB; Forster P; Cook TM
    Br J Anaesth; 2007 Sep; 99(3):425-8. PubMed ID: 17596593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dental fracture risk of metal vs plastic laryngoscope blades in dental models.
    Itoman EM; Kajioka EH; Yamamoto LG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 23(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 15765342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Infection control practices of laryngoscope blades: a review of the literature.
    Machan MD
    AANA J; 2012 Aug; 80(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 23251996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Design for a three-dimensional printed laryngoscope blade for the intubation of rats.
    Vongerichten A; Aristovich K; dos Santos GS; McEvoy AW; Holder DS
    Lab Anim (NY); 2014 Apr; 43(4):140-2. PubMed ID: 24651789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
    Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
    Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intubation with channeled versus non-channeled video laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway by junior doctors in an out-of-hospital setting: A crossover manikin study.
    Chew SH; Lim JZM; Chin BZB; Chan JX; Siew RCH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224017. PubMed ID: 31639167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment.
    Szarpak L; Peacock FW; Rafique Z; Ladny JR; Nadolny K; Malysz M; Dabrowski M; Chirico F; Smereka J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Mar; 53():122-126. PubMed ID: 35016094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Learning curves of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists: a clinical study.
    Di Marco P; Scattoni L; Spinoglio A; Luzi M; Canneti A; Pietropaoli P; Reale C
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Jan; 112(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 21048093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
    Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways.
    White M; Weale N; Nolan J; Sale S; Bayley G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 19659602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of the curved blade size on the outcomes of tracheal intubation performed by incoming interns: A randomized controlled manikin study.
    Kim JH; Kim SW; Kim YM; Cho Y; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(34):e11984. PubMed ID: 30142833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Performance of different laryngoscope blades for emergency intubation in prehospital setting.
    Wang Q; Xue FS; Liao X; Yuan YJ; Xiong J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Sep; 29(7):814-5; author reply 815-6. PubMed ID: 21514768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
    Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.