140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36628803)
1. Characterization and Clinical Use of Bone Conduction Transducers at Extended High Frequencies.
Remenschneider AK; Cheng JT; Herrmann BS; Rosowski JJ
Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108688. PubMed ID: 36628803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended high-frequency bone conduction audiometry Calibration of bone conductor transducers in the conventional and extended high-frequency range.
Rhebergen KS
Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 35195500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Bone-Conducted Cervical VEMPs Elicited by B71 and B81 Bone Vibrators.
Romero DJ; Piker EG; Thorne A; Clinard C
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):596-605. PubMed ID: 33577217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.
Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Johannsen L; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 25519145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem response with the new audiometric bone conduction transducer Radioear B81.
Keceli S; Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):577-583. PubMed ID: 29911916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of transducer types on bone conduction hearing thresholds.
Fröhlich L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195233. PubMed ID: 29641550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Air conduction, bone conduction, and soft tissue conduction audiograms in normal hearing and simulated hearing losses.
Adelman C; Cohen A; Regev-Cohen A; Chordekar S; Fraenkel R; Sohmer H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 25597465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vibrotactile Thresholds on the Mastoid and Forehead Position of Deaf Patients Using Radioear B71 and B81.
Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Fröhlich L; Rahne T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):714-723. PubMed ID: 28737551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholds.
Eichenauer A; Dillon H; Clinch B; Loi T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL96-102. PubMed ID: 25096153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Middle-ear function at high frequencies quantified with advanced bone-conduction measures.
Popelka GR; Telukuntla G; Puria S
Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):85-92. PubMed ID: 19900526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electroacoustic evaluation of the bone conduction transducer B250 for vestibular and hearing diagnostics in comparison with Radioear B71 and B81.
Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Persson AC; Verrecchia L; Reinfeldt S
Int J Audiol; 2024 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38742487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended high-frequency audiometry in healthy adults with different age groups.
Wang M; Ai Y; Han Y; Fan Z; Shi P; Wang H
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Aug; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 34446093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Thresholds Obtained With the Radioear B-71 and B-81 Bone-Conduction Transducers.
Rao A; Altus B; Schroeder R; Margolis RH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1775-1778. PubMed ID: 33136651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel Method to Determine the Maximum Output of Individual Patients for an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant Using Clinical Routine Data.
Ghoncheh M; Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):219-226. PubMed ID: 37580866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of stimulation position on the sensitivity for bone conduction hearing aids without skin penetration.
Dobrev I; Stenfelt S; Röösli C; Bolt L; Pfiffner F; Gerig R; Huber A; Sim JH
Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):439-46. PubMed ID: 27139310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative effective frequency response of bone versus air conduction stimulation examined via masking.
Durrant JD; Hyre R
Audiology; 1993; 32(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The balanced electromagnetic separation transducer a new bone conduction transducer.
Håkansson BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):818-25. PubMed ID: 12597176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High frequency bone conduction auditory evoked potentials in the guinea pig: Assessing cochlear injury after ossicular chain manipulation.
Bergin MJ; Bird PA; Vlajkovic SM; Thorne PR
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):147-54. PubMed ID: 26493491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
