These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3662906)

  • 1. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10321527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls.
    Chauhan BC; House PH; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 117(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 9930157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1252-4. PubMed ID: 3046588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do pattern deviation values accurately estimate glaucomatous visual field damage in eyes with glaucoma and cataract?
    Matsuda A; Hara T; Miyata K; Matsuo H; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1240-4. PubMed ID: 25795915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability.
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Aug; 101(8):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7741836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields.
    Birch MK; Wishart PK; O'Donnell NP
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Aug; 102(8):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. PubMed ID: 9097752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment.
    Katz J; Congdon N; Friedman DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Sep; 117(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 10496384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA; Poinoosawmy D; McNaught AI; Crabb DP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 8664231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
    Asman P; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 110(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 1596230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated perimetry in amblyopia: a generalized depression.
    Donahue SP; Wall M; Kutzko KE; Kardon RH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 127(3):312-21. PubMed ID: 10088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac.
    Zalta AH; Burchfield JC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1990 May; 74(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 2354137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Katz J; Sommer A; Gaasterland DE; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1991 Dec; 109(12):1684-9. PubMed ID: 1841576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.