These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3662940)

  • 1. Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory.
    Valdes-Sosa MJ; Bobes MA; Perez-Abalo MC; Perera M; Carballo JA; Valdes-Sosa P
    Audiology; 1987; 26(3):166-78. PubMed ID: 3662940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of postaverage SNR from evoked responses under nonstationary noise.
    Silva I
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 56(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 19403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Møller AR
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1985; 13(2):97-123. PubMed ID: 3905257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing statistics for objective detection of transient and steady-state evoked responses in newborns.
    Mijares E; Pérez Abalo MC; Herrera D; Lage A; Vega M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 23153253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
    Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified variance ratio for objective detection of transient evoked potentials in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).
    Finneran JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4069-82. PubMed ID: 19206829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wavelet domain nonlinear filtering for evoked potential signal enhancement.
    Sita G; Ramakrishnan AG
    Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Dec; 33(6):431-46. PubMed ID: 11150236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain-stem auditory impairment during the neonatal period in term infants after asphyxia: dynamic changes in brain-stem auditory evoked response to clicks of different rates.
    Jiang ZD; Yin R; Shao XM; Wilkinson AR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1605-15. PubMed ID: 15203061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peak detection in auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials by means of the zero-crossings wavelet representation.
    van der Kouwe AJ; Burgess RC
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():71-6. PubMed ID: 9731338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Processing of the brain stem auditory evoked potential signals].
    Hrubý M
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1986; 29(4-5):283-8. PubMed ID: 3501878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional filter to facilitate detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Grandori F; Ruohonen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Advance in signal analysis of auditory evoked potential].
    Yang J; Peng C; Wu B
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 20(3):563-6. PubMed ID: 14565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding spectral leakage in objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked responses in the inferior colliculus of rat using coherence.
    Felix LB; Moraes JE; Miranda de Sá AM; Yehia HC; Moraes MF
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Jun; 144(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 15910985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An automatic sequential recognition method for cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Hoppe U; Weiss S; Stewart RW; Eysholdt U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 11296871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimal repetition evoked potentials by modified adaptive line enhancement.
    Madhavan PG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):760-4. PubMed ID: 1516944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.