These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36629651)

  • 1. Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction.
    Elpo JA; Araújo BA; Volpato LK
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(1):119-123. PubMed ID: 36629651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
    Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
    El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.
    Jozwiak M; ten Eikelder M; Oude Rengerink K; de Groot C; Feitsma H; Spaanderman M; van Pampus M; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp K;
    Am J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 23564065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    West HM; Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD009792. PubMed ID: 28599068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of combination of transcervical Foley catheter and sublingual misoprostol versus sublingual misoprostol for labor induction in pre-eclampsia at 28-34 weeks.
    Sharma J; Sagili H; Keepanasseril A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 May; 161(2):432-438. PubMed ID: 36151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Mast K; van der Velden A; Bloemenkamp KW; Mol BW
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2016 Oct; 71(10):620-630. PubMed ID: 27770132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Kerr RS; Kumar N; Williams MJ; Cuthbert A; Aflaifel N; Haas DM; Weeks AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD014484. PubMed ID: 34155622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yin J; Li Y; Chen Y; Wang C; Song X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():76-84. PubMed ID: 36566685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.