These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36629736)

  • 1. Combining observational and experimental datasets using shrinkage estimators.
    Rosenman ETR; Basse G; Owen AB; Baiocchi M
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):2961-2973. PubMed ID: 36629736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SURE Estimates for a Heteroscedastic Hierarchical Model.
    Xie X; Kou SC; Brown LD
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2012 Dec; 107(500):1465-1479. PubMed ID: 25301976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference.
    Liu L; Hudgens MG; Becker-Dreps S
    Biometrika; 2016 Dec; 103(4):829-842. PubMed ID: 29422692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating Structural Equation Models Using James-Stein Type Shrinkage Estimators.
    Burghgraeve E; De Neve J; Rosseel Y
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):96-130. PubMed ID: 33738686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stein-type shrinkage estimators in gamma regression model with application to prostate cancer data.
    Mandal S; Arabi Belaghi R; Mahmoudi A; Aminnejad M
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4310-4322. PubMed ID: 31317564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Empirical Bayes Approach to Shrinkage Estimation on the Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices.
    Yang CH; Doss H; Vemuri BC
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2024; 119(545):259-272. PubMed ID: 38590837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials.
    Ginestet CE; Emsley R; Landau S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1129-1148. PubMed ID: 31172884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. OPTIMAL SHRINKAGE ESTIMATION OF MEAN PARAMETERS IN FAMILY OF DISTRIBUTIONS WITH QUADRATIC VARIANCE.
    Xie X; Kou SC; Brown L
    Ann Stat; 2016 Mar; 44(2):564-597. PubMed ID: 27041778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of Large-Dimensional Covariance Matrices via Second-Order Stein-Type Regularization.
    Zhang B; Huang H; Chen J
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shrinkage estimators for covariance matrices.
    Daniels MJ; Kass RE
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1173-84. PubMed ID: 11764258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
    Zivich PN; Breskin A
    Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Instrumented difference-in-differences.
    Ye T; Ertefaie A; Flory J; Hennessy S; Small DS
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):569-581. PubMed ID: 36305081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.
    Boatman JA; Vock DM; Koopmeiners JS
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4126-4141. PubMed ID: 30109713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal inference for recurrent event data using pseudo-observations.
    Su CL; Platt RW; Plante JF
    Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 32432686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining Multiple Observational Data Sources to Estimate Causal Effects.
    Yang S; Ding P
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(531):1540-1554. PubMed ID: 33088006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.