These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36629764)
1. Polish Abortion Legal Framework after the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 22 October 2020 in case no. K 1/20: Impact on Doctors. Kocańda K; Adamczyk-Gruszka O Issues Law Med; 2022; 37(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 36629764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Scales of the European Court of Human Rights: Abortion Restriction in Poland, the European Consensus, and the State's Margin of Appreciation. Kapelańska-Pręgowska J Health Hum Rights; 2021 Dec; 23(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 34966237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Termination of pregnancy in Papua New Guinea: the traditional and contemporary position. McGoldrick IA P N G Med J; 1981 Jun; 24(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 6950597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health benefits of legal abortion: an analysis. Tyrer LB Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 12340404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation. Will JF Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A thoroughly regressive law. Kozakiewicz M Plan Parent Chall; 1993; (1):10-1. PubMed ID: 12345315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion laws in the United States: Turning the calendar back 50 years? Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):175-178. PubMed ID: 35699297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Webster case: implications for Georgia physicians. Harris AL J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Sep; 78(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 2778409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]