188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36630537)
1. Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifier.
Wilson E; Cruz F; Maclean D; Ghanawi J; McCann SK; Brennan PM; Liao J; Sena ES; Macleod M
Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 Jan; 137(2):181-193. PubMed ID: 36630537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification.
Langlois A; Nie JY; Thomas J; Hong QN; Pluye P
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):587-601. PubMed ID: 30103261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi-automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature.
Kebede MM; Le Cornet C; Fortner RT
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):156-172. PubMed ID: 35798691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
Natukunda A; Muchene LK
Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.
Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning approaches to analysing textual injury surveillance data: a systematic review.
Vallmuur K
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun; 79():41-9. PubMed ID: 25795924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A text-mining tool generated title-abstract screening workload savings: performance evaluation versus single-human screening.
Carey N; Harte M; Mc Cullagh L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():53-59. PubMed ID: 35654270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews.
Shemilt I; Khan N; Park S; Thomas J
Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):140. PubMed ID: 27535658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes.
Hamel C; Kelly SE; Thavorn K; Rice DB; Wells GA; Hutton B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):256. PubMed ID: 33059590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning models for abstract screening task - A systematic literature review application for health economics and outcome research.
Du J; Soysal E; Wang D; He L; Lin B; Wang J; Manion FJ; Li Y; Wu E; Yao L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):108. PubMed ID: 38724903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
