162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36630858)
1. On the relationship between occlusion times and in-car glance durations in simulated driving.
Grahn H; Kujala T; Taipalus T; Lee J; Lee JD
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 182():106955. PubMed ID: 36630858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occlusion as a measure for visual workload: an overview of TNO occlusion research in car driving.
van der Horst R
Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 15145281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems.
Peng Y; Boyle LN
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():93-101. PubMed ID: 26406538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Drivers' Attention Strategies before Eyes-off-Road in Different Traffic Scenarios: Adaptation and Anticipation.
Liu Z; Yuan W; Ma Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33918239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection and response to critical lead vehicle deceleration events with peripheral vision: Glance response times are independent of visual eccentricity.
Svärd M; Bärgman J; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105853. PubMed ID: 33310650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving.
Kircher K; Ahlstrom C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():40-47. PubMed ID: 28341312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chinese carless young drivers' self-reported driving behavior and simulated driving performance.
Zhang Q; Jiang Z; Zheng D; Man D; Xu X
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(8):853-60. PubMed ID: 24073774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Dynamic Complexity on Drivers' Secondary Task Scanning Behavior under a Car-Following Scenario.
Wang L; Li H; Guo M; Chen Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does order matter? Investigating the effect of sequence on glance duration during on-road driving.
Lee J; Roberts SC; Reimer B; Mehler B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171730. PubMed ID: 28158301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional Demand as a Function of Contextual Factors in Different Traffic Scenarios.
Liu Z; Ahlström C; Forsman Å; Kircher K
Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1171-1189. PubMed ID: 31424969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driving Frequency Modulates Correlations Between Executive Functions and Driving Performance: A Driving Simulator Study.
Lo YH; Chiu A; Tseng P
Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Dec; 130(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 37962038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
