These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36630858)

  • 21. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving.
    Konstantopoulos P; Chapman P; Crundall D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):827-34. PubMed ID: 20380909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving.
    Kujala T; Kircher K; Ahlström C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 33908809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drivers' Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study.
    Ma Y; Qi S; Zhang Y; Lian G; Lu W; Chan CY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32722496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Influence of Visual-Manual Distractions on Anticipatory Driving.
    He D; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 32663070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S; Xu D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():122-130. PubMed ID: 30025353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multinomial choice model approach for dynamic driver vision transitions.
    Huang SH; Wong JT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():107-17. PubMed ID: 25463950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic is optimal: Effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Zhi J; Guo G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 34937441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can variations in visual behavior measures be good predictors of driver sleepiness? A real driving test study.
    Wang Y; Xin M; Bai H; Zhao Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb; 18(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 27763776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
    Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
    Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention allocation patterns in naturalistic driving.
    Wong JT; Huang SH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():140-7. PubMed ID: 23743253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.