These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36631175)

  • 1. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
    Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
    Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolving latent conflict: What happens when latent print examiners enter the cage?
    Rairden A; Garrett BL; Kelley S; Murrie D; Castillo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():215-222. PubMed ID: 29933202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel approach for latent print identification using accurate overlays to prioritize reference prints.
    Gantz DT; Gantz DT; Walch MA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():162-70. PubMed ID: 25447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111598. PubMed ID: 36801503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latent Print Proficiency Testing: An Examination of Test Respondents, Test-Taking Procedures, and Test Characteristics.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Pan KDH
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):450-457. PubMed ID: 31509243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical note: Next generation identification - A powerful tool in cold case investigations.
    Stokes J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():74-79. PubMed ID: 30959402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of blind proficiency testing among latent print examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M
    Sci Justice; 2023 Mar; 63(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 36870700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature.
    Mukhra R; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():101-112. PubMed ID: 29777981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.