BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36631936)

  • 1. B-line Elastography Measurement of Lung Parenchymal Elasticity.
    Koda R; Taniguchi H; Konno K; Yamakoshi Y
    Ultrason Imaging; 2023 Jan; 45(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 36631936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical coherence elastography to evaluate depth-resolved elasticity of tissue.
    Yang C; Xiang Z; Li Z; Nan N; Wang X
    Opt Express; 2022 Mar; 30(6):8709-8722. PubMed ID: 35299317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-Resolution Elastography for Thin-Layer Mechanical Characterization: Toward Skin Investigation.
    Chartier C; Mofid Y; Bastard C; Miette V; Maruani A; Machet L; Ossant F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):670-681. PubMed ID: 28043724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging feedback of histotripsy treatments using ultrasound shear wave elastography.
    Wang TY; Hall TL; Xu Z; Fowlkes JB; Cain CA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1167-81. PubMed ID: 22711412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus.
    Pagé G; Bied M; Garteiser P; Van Beers B; Etaix N; Fraschini C; Bel-Brunon A; Gennisson JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Scholte wave approach for ultrasonic surface acoustic wave elastography.
    Liu J; Leer J; Aglayomov SR; Emelianov SY
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 36971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Effect of Tissue Compression on the Results of Shear Wave Elastography Measurements.
    Vachutka J; Sedlackova Z; Furst T; Herman M; Herman J; Salzman R; Dolezal L
    Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Nov; 40(6):380-393. PubMed ID: 30101677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does group velocity always reflect elastic modulus in shear wave elastography?
    Pelivanov I; Gao L; Pitre J; Kirby M; Song S; Li D; Shen T; Wang R; O'Donnell M
    J Biomed Opt; 2019 Jul; 24(7):1-11. PubMed ID: 31342691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography.
    Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Bercoff J; Tanter M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2032-5. PubMed ID: 21989866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for characterization of tissue elastic properties combining ultrasonic computed tomography with elastography.
    Glozman T; Azhari H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Mar; 29(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 20194935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for shear wave speed estimation in shear wave elastography.
    Engel AJ; Bashford GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2106-14. PubMed ID: 26670851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New Criterion for Shear Wave Elastometric Assessment Using Modulus of Stiffness Difference between Object and Environment.
    Demin IY; Rykhtik PI; Spivak АE; Safonov DV
    Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(5):5-13. PubMed ID: 37181832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probe Oscillation Shear Elastography (PROSE): A High Frame-Rate Method for Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.
    Mellema DC; Song P; Kinnick RR; Urban MW; Greenleaf JF; Manduca A; Chen S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2098-106. PubMed ID: 27076352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear wave elastography of the testes in a healthy study collective - Differences in standard values between ARFI and VTIQ techniques.
    Marcon J; Trottmann M; Rübenthaler J; Stief CG; Reiser MF; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 64(4):721-728. PubMed ID: 27935546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D mapping of elastic modulus using shear wave optical micro-elastography.
    Zhu J; Qi L; Miao Y; Ma T; Dai C; Qu Y; He Y; Gao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35499. PubMed ID: 27762276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion effects on the measurement of stiffness on ultrasound shear wave elastography: a moving liver fibrosis phantom study.
    Shin HJ; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee K; Lee KS; Park JC; Lee MJ; Yoon H
    Med Ultrason; 2018 Feb; 1(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 29400362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of Vibration Waveform on MR Elastography].
    Tanaka M; Numano T; Habe T; Ito D; Maeno T; Ueki T; Igarashi K; Mizuhara K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 30890671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUV on gelatin phantoms.
    Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Chen Q; An KN; Greenleaf JF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1706-14. PubMed ID: 21317078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the novel estimation method by shear wave elastography using vibrator to human skeletal muscle.
    Tsuchida W; Yamakoshi Y; Matsuo S; Asakawa M; Sugahara K; Fukaya T; Yamanaka E; Asai Y; Nitta N; Ooie T; Suzuki S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):22248. PubMed ID: 33335237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.