These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36632660)
21. Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring. Nagler M; Podmirseg SM; Ascher-Jenull J; Sint D; Traugott M Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 35652762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Environmental DNA: The next chapter. Blackman R; Couton M; Keck F; Kirschner D; Carraro L; Cereghetti E; Perrelet K; Bossart R; Brantschen J; Zhang Y; Altermatt F Mol Ecol; 2024 Jun; 33(11):e17355. PubMed ID: 38624076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advances in environmental DNA monitoring: standardization, automation, and emerging technologies in aquatic ecosystems. Lu S; Zeng H; Xiong F; Yao M; He S Sci China Life Sci; 2024 Jul; 67(7):1368-1384. PubMed ID: 38512561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monitoring of spatiotemporal occupancy patterns of fish and amphibian species in a lentic aquatic system using environmental DNA. Brys R; Haegeman A; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Staelens A; Auwerx J; Ruttink T Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3097-3110. PubMed ID: 33222312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction. Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments. Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17782. PubMed ID: 36273070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods. Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing without harvesting: Pros and cons of environmental DNA sampling and image analysis for marine biodiversity evaluation. Kopp D; Faillettaz R; Le Joncour A; Simon J; Morandeau F; Le Bourdonnec P; Bouché L; Méhault S Mar Environ Res; 2023 Jun; 188():106004. PubMed ID: 37127004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficiency of eDNA and iDNA in assessing vertebrate diversity and its abundance. Carvalho CS; de Oliveira ME; Rodriguez-Castro KG; Saranholi BH; Galetti PM Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 May; 22(4):1262-1273. PubMed ID: 34724330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploitation of environmental DNA (eDNA) for ecotoxicological research: A critical review on eDNA metabarcoding in assessing marine pollution. Rishan ST; Kline RJ; Rahman MS Chemosphere; 2024 Mar; 351():141238. PubMed ID: 38242519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to investigate fish community composition and its seasonal changes in the Oslo fjord. Carvalho CO; Gromstad W; Dunthorn M; Karlsen HE; Schrøder-Nielsen A; Ready JS; Haugaasen T; Sørnes G; de Boer H; Mauvisseau Q Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10154. PubMed ID: 38698067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution. Takahashi M; Saccò M; Kestel JH; Nester G; Campbell MA; van der Heyde M; Heydenrych MJ; Juszkiewicz DJ; Nevill P; Dawkins KL; Bessey C; Fernandes K; Miller H; Power M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Newton JP; White NE; Richards ZT; Allentoft ME Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162322. PubMed ID: 36801404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring. Couton M; Lévêque L; Daguin-Thiébaut C; Comtet T; Viard F Biofouling; 2022 Apr; 38(4):367-383. PubMed ID: 35575060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward. Yao M; Zhang S; Lu Q; Chen X; Zhang SY; Kong Y; Zhao J Mol Ecol; 2022 Oct; 31(20):5132-5164. PubMed ID: 35972241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Taking eDNA underground: Factors affecting eDNA detection of subterranean fauna in groundwater. van der Heyde M; White NE; Nevill P; Austin AD; Stevens N; Jones M; Guzik MT Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Aug; 23(6):1257-1274. PubMed ID: 36999608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring. Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool? Adams CIM; Knapp M; Gemmell NJ; Jeunen GJ; Bunce M; Lamare MD; Taylor HR Genes (Basel); 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30832286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatio-temporal variability of eDNA signal and its implication for fish monitoring in lakes. Hervé A; Domaizon I; Baudoin JM; Dejean T; Gibert P; Jean P; Peroux T; Raymond JC; Valentini A; Vautier M; Logez M PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272660. PubMed ID: 35960745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]