162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36632986)
1. Strength of implant-supported lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network restorations after thermomechanical aging.
Gil A; Eliades G; Özcan M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Ioannidis A
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 36632986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Thermomechanical Loading on the Cementation Interface of Implant-Supported CAD/CAM Crowns Luted to Titanium Abutments.
Ioannidis A; Gil A; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Zinelis S; Eliades G
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):656-662. PubMed ID: 33284908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Load-bearing capacities of ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to dentin.
Maeder M; Pasic P; Ender A; Özcan M; Benic GI; Ioannidis A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jul; 95():165-171. PubMed ID: 31009900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
Emam M; Eldimeery A; Salah T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations.
Ioannidis A; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of monolithic restorative materials on the implant-abutment interface of hybrid abutment crowns: An in vitro investigation.
Graf T; Schweiger J; Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Schubert O; Güth JF
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):450-459. PubMed ID: 36517017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM 3D-printed zirconia, CAD/CAM milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers on molars.
Ioannidis A; Bomze D; Hämmerle CHF; Hüsler J; Birrer O; Mühlemann S
Dent Mater; 2020 Apr; 36(4):e109-e116. PubMed ID: 31992483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
Taha D; Sabet A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of sterilization on the retention forces of lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network crowns bonded to titanium base abutments: An in-vitro study.
Laforì A; Sailer I; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Burkhardt F; Pitta J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Apr; 35(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 38170349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wear resistance of CAD/CAM one-piece screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns made from different restorative materials.
Elsayed A; Chaar MS; Kern M; Libecki W; Yazigi C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 37408517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.
DuVall NB; DeReis SP; Vandewalle KS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):522-530. PubMed ID: 33174333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
