BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36633683)

  • 1. Stone ablation efficacy: a comparison of a thulium fibre laser and two pulse-modulated holmium:YAG lasers.
    Yang B; Ray A; Zhang JJ; Peng S; O'Brien M; Turney B
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Jan; 51(1):31. PubMed ID: 36633683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.
    Blackmon RL; Irby PB; Fried NM
    J Biomed Opt; 2011 Jul; 16(7):071403. PubMed ID: 21806249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers.
    Ventimiglia E; Doizi S; Kovalenko A; Andreeva V; Traxer O
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 32277557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.
    Basulto-Martínez M; Proietti S; Pavia MP; Yeow Y; Eisner BH; Giusti G
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Jan; 51(1):32. PubMed ID: 36648558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ablation rates with Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser: Influence of the stone phantom homogeneity. An in vitro study.
    Kutchukian S; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Germain T; Dragos L; Berthe L; Solano C; Candela L; Corrales M; Chicaud M; Traxer O; Panthier F
    Prog Urol; 2023 Aug; 33(8-9):456-462. PubMed ID: 37442755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on Soft Tissue: An
    Doizi S; Germain T; Panthier F; Compérat E; Traxer O; Berthe L
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 34409842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Ulvik Ø; Æsøy MS; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
    Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 35300888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Lasers Ablate Stones:
    Taratkin M; Laukhtina E; Singla N; Tarasov A; Alekseeva T; Enikeev M; Enikeev D
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):931-936. PubMed ID: 31885281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
    Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers.
    Ortner G; Rice P; Nagele U; Herrmann TRW; Somani BK; Tokas T
    World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36515722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
    Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus!
    Sierra A; Corrales M; Piñero A; Kolvatzis M; Somani B; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2313-2321. PubMed ID: 35933626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: meta-analysis of clinical studies.
    Chua ME; Bobrowski A; Ahmad I; Kim JK; Silangcruz JM; Rickard M; Lorenzo A; Lee JY
    BJU Int; 2023 Apr; 131(4):383-394. PubMed ID: 36260370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.
    Solano C; Corrales M; Panthier F; Candela L; Doizi S; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2627-2636. PubMed ID: 37468656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser
    Jiang P; Okhunov Z; Afyouni AS; Ali S; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Bhatt R; Brevik A; Ayad M; Larson K; Osann K; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2023 Mar; 37(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 36401505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study.
    Panthier F; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Chaussain C; Kogane N; Berthe L; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1683-1691. PubMed ID: 32253581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Thulium or holmium laser or both: where will the journey take us?].
    Becker B; Hook S; Gross AJ; Rosenbaum C; Filmar S; Herrmann J; Netsch C
    Aktuelle Urol; 2024 Jun; 55(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 38604230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case?
    Taratkin M; Kovalenko A; Laukhtina E; Paramonova N; Spivak L; Wachtendorf LJ; Eminovic S; Afyouni AS; Okhunov Z; Karagezyan M; Mikhailov V; Strakhov Y; Herrmann TR; Enikeev D
    Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Feb; 37(1):149-154. PubMed ID: 33175250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser.
    Kraft L; Petzold R; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
    Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 37(3):2071-2078. PubMed ID: 34905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).
    Taratkin M; Azilgareeva C; Petov V; Morozov A; Ali S; Babaevskaya D; De Coninck V; Korolev D; Akopyan G; Scoffone CM; Chinenov D; Androsov A; Fajkovic H; Lifshitz D; Traxer O; Enikeev D
    World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3705-3711. PubMed ID: 37855897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.