These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36633820)

  • 1. Surviving with story characters: What do we remember?
    Cook AM; Klin CM; Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1303-1316. PubMed ID: 36633820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?
    Gelin M; Bugaiska A; Méot A; Bonin P
    Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 26642740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension.
    Foy JE; Gerrig RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1250-9. PubMed ID: 24972560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thinking about the past: early knowledge about links between prior experience, thinking, and emotion.
    Lagattuta KH; Wellman HM
    Child Dev; 2001; 72(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 11280491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character's linguistic actions.
    Gunraj DN; Drumm-Hewitt AM; Klin CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):364-75. PubMed ID: 24219085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can survival processing enhance story memory? Testing the generalizability of the adaptive memory framework.
    Seamon JG; Bohn JM; Coddington IE; Ebling MC; Grund EM; Haring CT; Jang SJ; Kim D; Liong C; Paley FM; Pang LK; Siddique AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 22288816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching for Judy: how small mysteries affect narrative processes and memory.
    Love J; McKoon G; Gerrig RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 20438273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does survival context enhance memory for source? A within-subjects comparison.
    Misirlisoy M; Tanyas H; Atalay NB
    Memory; 2019 Jul; 27(6):780-791. PubMed ID: 30648918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of survival processing on memory for pictures depends on how memory is tested.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; O'Connor RJ; Dean GM
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 36705639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seeing what they read and hearing what they say: readers' representation of the story characters' world.
    Klin CM; Drumm AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 20382925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schema representations in distinct brain networks support narrative memory during encoding and retrieval.
    Masís-Obando R; Norman KA; Baldassano C
    Elife; 2022 Apr; 11():. PubMed ID: 35393941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Animates are better remembered than inanimates: further evidence from word and picture stimuli.
    Bonin P; Gelin M; Bugaiska A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 24078605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial text processing: are estimates of time and distance influenced by the age of characters and readers?
    Pazzaglia F; Iachini T; Meneghetti C
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):259-267. PubMed ID: 31549251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of emotion and encoding strategy on associative memory.
    Murray BD; Kensinger EA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1056-69. PubMed ID: 22592895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How readers experience characters' decisions.
    Jacovina ME; Gerrig RJ
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 20852238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paired-associate learning, animacy, and imageability effects in the survival advantage.
    Kazanas SA; Altarriba J; O'Brien EG
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):244-255. PubMed ID: 31916198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Waiting for Brandon: How Readers Respond to Small Mysteries.
    Gerrig RJ; Love J; McKoon G
    J Mem Lang; 2009 Jan; 60(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 20046984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Character movement and the representation of space during narrative comprehension.
    Rapp DN; Klug JL; Taylor HA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1206-20. PubMed ID: 17225503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From simple agents to information sources: Readers' differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency.
    Saux G; Vibert N; Dampuré J; Burin DI; Britt MA; Rouet JF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103191. PubMed ID: 33147538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information.
    Kang SH; McDermott KB; Cohen SM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18927033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.