BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36633905)

  • 1. Measuring quality of reporting in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical imaging: comparison of PRISMA-DTA and PRISMA.
    Li Q; Hou W; Li L; Xu J; Ren Y; Zou K; Tian R; Sun X
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 36633905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study.
    Prager R; Pratte M; Guy A; Bala S; Bachar R; Kim DJ; Millington S; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; McInnes MD
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33785511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.
    Salameh JP; McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Frank R; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Kraaijpoel N; Levis B; Bossuyt PM
    Clin Chem; 2019 Feb; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 30237150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
    Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).
    McGrath TA; Moher D; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):166. PubMed ID: 31296260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) of Radiological Articles Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.
    Kim W; Kim JH; Cha YK; Chong S; Kim TJ
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):258-275. PubMed ID: 35491344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting completeness in abstracts of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in cardiovascular diseases is suboptimal.
    Pagkalidou E; Anastasilakis DA; Kokkali S; Doundoulakis I; Tsapas A; Dardavessis T; Haidich AB
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2022; 65():25-34. PubMed ID: 35181563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
    McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM; ; Clifford T; Cohen JF; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Hooft L; Hunt HA; Hyde CJ; Korevaar DA; Leeflang MMG; Macaskill P; Reitsma JB; Rodin R; Rutjes AWS; Salameh JP; Stevens A; Takwoingi Y; Tonelli M; Weeks L; Whiting P; Willis BH
    JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 29362800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Panic N; Leoncini E; de Belvis G; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83138. PubMed ID: 24386151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
    McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
    Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting quality of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Narasimhan S; Faggion CM; Dharmarajan L; Jacob PS; Gopinath VK; Dummer PMH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3437-3445. PubMed ID: 36914841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study.
    Zhong J; Xing Y; Lu J; Zhang G; Mao S; Chen H; Yin Q; Cen Q; Jiang R; Hu Y; Ding D; Ge X; Zhang H; Yao W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):292. PubMed ID: 38093215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Medical Imaging Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: A Systematic Review.
    White SJ; Phua QS; Lu L; Yaxley KL; McInnes MDF; To MS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e240649. PubMed ID: 38421646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals.
    Pulikkotil SJ; Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 30887462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
    Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.