139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36634601)
21. Spatial orientation in bone samples and Young's modulus.
Geraets WG; van Ruijven LJ; Verheij JG; van der Stelt PF; van Eijden TM
J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2206-10. PubMed ID: 18539283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microdamage caused by fatigue loading in human cancellous bone: relationship to reductions in bone biomechanical performance.
Lambers FM; Bouman AR; Rimnac CM; Hernandez CJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83662. PubMed ID: 24386247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mechanical properties of glenoid cancellous bone.
Kalouche I; Crépin J; Abdelmoumen S; Mitton D; Guillot G; Gagey O
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of the fixation technique on the mechanical properties of human cancellous bone of the femoral head.
Fischer B; Hofmann A; Kurz S; Edel M; Zajonz DJ; Roth A; Schleifenbaum S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Feb; 82():105280. PubMed ID: 33582564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of short-term alendronate treatment on the three-dimensional microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of dog trabecular bone.
Hu JH; Ding M; Søballe K; Bechtold JE; Danielsen CC; Day JS; Hvid I
Bone; 2002 Nov; 31(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 12477573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evolution during growth of the mechanical properties of the cortical bone in equine cannon-bones.
Bigot G; Bouzidi A; Rumelhart C; Martin-Rosset W
Med Eng Phys; 1996 Jan; 18(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 8771043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of bone demineralization due to the use of exoprosthesis by comparing Young's modulus of the femur in unilateral transfemoral amputees.
Ramírez JF; Isaza JA; Mariaka I; Vélez JA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 22005351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional microarchitecture of adolescent cancellous bone.
Ding M; Danielsen CC; Hvid I; Overgaard S
Bone; 2012 Nov; 51(5):953-60. PubMed ID: 22884723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation between Parameters of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Hip Structural Analysis in Osteoporotic Fracture Patients.
Zhang L; Lv H; Zheng H; Li M; Yin P; Peng Y; Gao Y; Zhang L; Tang P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145879. PubMed ID: 26710123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Method for Evaluating Cortical Bone Young's Modulus: Numerical Twin Reconstruction, Finite Element Calculation, and Microstructure Analysis.
Kurtz T; Woitrain T; Godio-Raboutet Y; Ribeiro FLB; Arnoux PJ; Tailhan JL
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Nov; 145(11):. PubMed ID: 37542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating differences in Young's Modulus of regenerated and uninjured mouse digit bone through microCT density-based calculation and nanoindentation testing.
Hoffseth KF; Busse E; Lacey M; Sammarco MC
J Biomech; 2022 Oct; 143():111271. PubMed ID: 36095912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modelling Young's modulus for porous bones with microstructural variation and anisotropy.
Wang JF
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2010 Feb; 21(2):463-72. PubMed ID: 19882305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microstructure Determines Apparent-Level Mechanics Despite Tissue-Level Anisotropy and Heterogeneity of Individual Plates and Rods in Normal Human Trabecular Bone.
Yu YE; Hu YJ; Zhou B; Wang J; Guo XE
J Bone Miner Res; 2021 Sep; 36(9):1796-1807. PubMed ID: 33989436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Apparent Young's modulus of vertebral cortico-cancellous bone specimens.
El Masri F; Sapin de Brosses E; Rhissassi K; Skalli W; Mitton D
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 21749276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determination of anisotropic elastic parameters from morphological parameters of cancellous bone for osteoporotic lumbar spine.
Oefner C; Riemer E; Funke K; Werner M; Heyde CE; Schoenfelder S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Jan; 60(1):263-278. PubMed ID: 34843037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia.
Ashman RB; Rho JY; Turner CH
J Biomech; 1989; 22(8-9):895-900. PubMed ID: 2693453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants.
Stahl E; Keilig L; Abdelgader I; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 19322530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density.
Rice JC; Cowin SC; Bowman JA
J Biomech; 1988; 21(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 3350829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The ability of ultrasound velocity to predict the stiffness of cancellous bone in vitro.
Hodgskinson R; Njeh CF; Currey JD; Langton CM
Bone; 1997 Aug; 21(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 9267694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness.
Hernandez CJ; Lambers FM; Widjaja J; Chapa C; Rimnac CM
Bone; 2014 Sep; 66():205-13. PubMed ID: 24928495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
