These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36635637)

  • 1. Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36635637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validity of prevalence estimates from the national maternity surveys in England: The impact of response rate.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242815. PubMed ID: 33253308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.
    Campos-Castillo C; Laestadius LI
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e20472. PubMed ID: 32568726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction: Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):28. PubMed ID: 36709258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
    Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
    Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.
    McMaster HS; LeardMann CA; Speigle S; Dillman DA;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 28441932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies.
    Harrison S; Henderson J; Alderdice F; Quigley MA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 30894130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effectiveness of "Push-to-Web" as an Option for a Survey of New Mothers.
    Tumin R; Johnson K; Spence D; Oza-Frank R
    Matern Child Health J; 2020 Aug; 24(8):960-965. PubMed ID: 32350731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nominal Versus Realized Costs of Recruiting and Retaining a National Sample of Sexual Minority Adolescents in the United States: Longitudinal Study.
    Mamey MR; Schrager SM; Rhoades H; Goldbach JT
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e36764. PubMed ID: 36729597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys.
    Braekman E; Demarest S; Charafeddine R; Drieskens S; Berete F; Gisle L; Van der Heyden J; Van Hal G
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e26299. PubMed ID: 34994701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.
    Patrick ME; Pang YC; Terry-McElrath YM; Laetz V; Couper MP
    Drug Alcohol Depend Rep; 2022 Sep; 4():. PubMed ID: 36120182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Paid and Free Facebook Methods to Recruit Australian Parents to an Online Survey: An Evaluation.
    Bennetts SK; Hokke S; Crawford S; Hackworth NJ; Leach LS; Nguyen C; Nicholson JM; Cooklin AR
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e11206. PubMed ID: 30839282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.
    Fitzgerald D; Hockey R; Jones M; Mishra G; Waller M; Dobson A
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10672. PubMed ID: 30869647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achieving proportional representation in a reproductive health survey through social media: process and recommendations.
    McCarthy OL; Palmer MJ; Gubijev A; Wellings K; Mann S; Leon L; Callaghan F; Patterson S; French RS
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):1370. PubMed ID: 35842621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey.
    Erens B; Burkill S; Couper MP; Conrad F; Clifton S; Tanton C; Phelps A; Datta J; Mercer CH; Sonnenberg P; Prah P; Mitchell KR; Wellings K; Johnson AM; Copas AJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e276. PubMed ID: 25488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.