These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36636853)
1. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis]. Zarakolu P Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study. Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio. Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing. Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-country comparative study of two treponemal tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM): Chemo-luminescent assay vs Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. Gios L; Mirandola M; Cordioli M; Zorzi A; Sherriff N; Vera J; Wlazly D; Hassan-Ibrahim MO; Padovese V; Anabel Darmanin ; Peeling RW; Unemo M; Blondeel K; Toskin I BMC Infect Dis; 2024 Mar; 24(Suppl 1):313. PubMed ID: 38486194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for syphilis with dual algorithms: analysis of discordant and concordant serology results in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. Zhuang YH; Liu H; Tang J; Wang YZ; Zheng XH; Gong Y; Xu XF; Gao X; Lu RQ; Ju SG; Guo L J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):178-184. PubMed ID: 30223307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved efficiency using sequential automated immunoassays for syphilis screening in blood donors. Cheng A; Das A; Styles CE; Naing Z; Rawlinson WD; Gosbell IB J Clin Microbiol; 2024 Aug; 62(8):e0047624. PubMed ID: 39007562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis. Satyaputra F; Hendry S; Braddick M; Sivabalan P; Norton R J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 59(10):e0010021. PubMed ID: 33980644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening]. Ozbek OA; Doğan Y Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection. Bristow CC; Klausner JD J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis. Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited efficacy of nontreponemal test combined with treponemal test in the initial syphilis screening algorithm. Gambiez C; Garet C; Choquet M; Decroix V; Pluquet E; Guiheneuf R; Castelain S J Med Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 68(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 30570479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, the Murex Syphilis ICE and the Enzywell TP tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis. Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Apr; 16(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15899082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Aug; 57(32):872-5. PubMed ID: 18701877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection. Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of New Automated Treponemal Tests in the Diagnosis of Early Syphilis: A Series of 15 Cases. García-Legaz Martínez M; Hernández-Bel P; Magdaleno-Tapial J; Martínez-Doménech A; Navalpotro D; Alegre-de Miquel V; Pérez-Ferriols A Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2020 Mar; 111(2):135-142. PubMed ID: 31831159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods. Simčič S; Potočnik M Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2015; 24(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 26086162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis. Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]