These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36637644)

  • 1. Metacognitive awareness of the pretesting effect improves with self-regulation support.
    Pan SC; Rivers ML
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1461-1480. PubMed ID: 36637644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.
    Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice.
    Pan SC; Sana F
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):237-257. PubMed ID: 33793291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A little can go a long way: giving learners some context can enhance the benefits of pretesting.
    Overoye AL; James KK; Storm BC
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1206-1215. PubMed ID: 34486928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the pretesting effect: What happens to the information that is not pretested?
    James KK; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):576-587. PubMed ID: 31169394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia.
    Furnes B; Norman E
    Dyslexia; 2015 Aug; 21(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26234622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theories of intelligence influence self-regulated study choices and learning.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 31282727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Broader benefits of the pretesting effect: Placement matters.
    Sana F; Carpenter SK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1908-1916. PubMed ID: 37002447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of individual and group metacognitive prompts on EFL reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning.
    Teng F; Reynolds BL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215902. PubMed ID: 31116739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When pretesting fails to enhance learning concepts from reading texts.
    Hausman H; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):331-346. PubMed ID: 29723010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1085-101. PubMed ID: 27177505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of self-directed online metacognitive listening practice on Chinese EFL learners' listening ability, metacognition, and self-efficacy.
    Pei T; Suwanthep J; Lu H
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1285059. PubMed ID: 38022949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores.
    Kostons D; van der Werf G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):264-75. PubMed ID: 25752451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test Experience, Direct Instruction, and Their Combination Promote Accurate Beliefs about the Testing Effect.
    Rivers ML
    J Intell; 2023 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 37504790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.