These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3663795)

  • 21. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory hallucinations and the mismatch negativity: processing speech and non-speech sounds in schizophrenia.
    Fisher DJ; Labelle A; Knott VJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Oct; 70(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 18511139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phonemes, intensity and attention: differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Szymanski MD; Yund EW; Woods DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3492-505. PubMed ID: 10615689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Language context and phonetic change detection.
    Winkler I; Kujala T; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):833-44. PubMed ID: 14561466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of selective attention as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Berman S; Friedman D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Feb; 59(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7876768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study.
    Henkin Y; Kileny PR; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18595188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different.
    Kraus N; McGee T; Micco A; Sharma A; Carrell T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7681753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience.
    Kirmse U; Ylinen S; Tervaniemi M; Vainio M; Schröger E; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 18160160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Event-related potentials associated with sound discrimination versus novelty detection in children.
    Ceponiene R; Lepistö T; Soininen M; Aronen E; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):130-41. PubMed ID: 14693008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cortical differences in tonal versus vowel processing as revealed by an ERP component called mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Aaltonen O; Tuomainen J; Laine M; Niemi P
    Brain Lang; 1993 Feb; 44(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 8428308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2174-85. PubMed ID: 19947859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related potential indices of auditory vowel processing in 3-year-old children.
    Ceponiene R; Lepistö T; Alku P; Aro H; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 114(4):652-61. PubMed ID: 12686274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds.
    Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential.
    Wunderlich JL; Cone-Wesson BK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1526-37. PubMed ID: 11325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.