BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3663815)

  • 1. Threshold dose-response models in toxicology.
    Cox C
    Biometrics; 1987 Sep; 43(3):511-23. PubMed ID: 3663815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves.
    Prentice RL
    Biometrics; 1976 Dec; 32(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 1009225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2005 Dec; 138(3):379-411. PubMed ID: 16098930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hormesis: from marginalization to mainstream: a case for hormesis as the default dose-response model in risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 197(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 15163548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The failure of dose-response models to predict low dose effects: a major challenge for biomedical, toxicological and aging research.
    Calabrese EJ
    Biogerontology; 2006 Apr; 7(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16802115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general noninteractive multiple toxicity model including probit, logit, and Weibull transformations.
    Christensen ER; Chen CY
    Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):711-25. PubMed ID: 4074820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A generalized multihit dose-response model for low-dose extrapolation.
    Rai K; Van Ryzin J
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7272419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dose-response model incorporating nonlinear kinetics.
    Van Ryzin J; Rai K
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 3567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of background in dose-response models.
    Hoel DG
    Fed Proc; 1980 Jan; 39(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 7351247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right.
    Calabrese EJ
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2005 Dec; 51(7):643-54. PubMed ID: 16359616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold Dose--Response Model--RIP: 1911 to 2006.
    Calabrese EJ
    Bioessays; 2007 Jul; 29(7):686-8. PubMed ID: 17563088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose response considerations in risk assessment--an overview of recent ILSI activities.
    Holsapple MP; Wallace KB
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 18588961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test of marginal compatibility and smoothing methods for exchangeable binary data with unequal cluster sizes.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):218-27. PubMed ID: 17447948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pairwise fitting of mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal profiles.
    Fieuws S; Verbeke G
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 16918906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalized Spearman estimators of relative dose.
    Morton R
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 7272411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evolution of industrial toxicology toward vanishing doses and the human genome].
    Colombi A; Buratti M; Rubino FM; Giampiccolo R; Pulvirenti S; Brambilla G
    Med Lav; 2003; 94(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 12768958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Mar; 83(3):227-47. PubMed ID: 19234688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating extra information in experimental design for bioassay.
    Nordheim EV; Tsiatis A; Shapas TJ
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6871365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.