These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36639210)

  • 21. The C-MAC® video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first-attempt intubations in the emergency department.
    Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Patanwala AE; Dicken JM; Kalin L; Javedani PP
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 48(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 25498851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol.
    Bailly A; Lascarrou JB; Le Thuaut A; Boisrame-Helms J; Kamel T; Mercier E; Ricard JD; Lemiale V; Champigneulle B; Reignier J;
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e009855. PubMed ID: 26700287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anaesthesia protocol evaluation of the videolaryngoscopy with the McGrath MAC and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in 1000 patients undergoing rapid sequence induction: the randomised multicentre LARA trial study protocol.
    Kriege M; Lang P; Lang C; Pirlich N; Griemert EV; Heid F; Wittenmeier E; Schmidtmann I; Schmidbauer W; Jänig C; Jungbecker J; Kunitz O; Strate M; Schmutz A
    BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e052977. PubMed ID: 34615684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Driver BE; Semler MW; Self WH; Ginde AA; Trent SA; Gandotra S; Smith LM; Page DB; Vonderhaar DJ; West JR; Joffe AM; Mitchell SH; Doerschug KC; Hughes CG; High K; Landsperger JS; Jackson KE; Howell MP; Robison SW; Gaillard JP; Whitson MR; Barnes CM; Latimer AJ; Koppurapu VS; Alvis BD; Russell DW; Gibbs KW; Wang L; Lindsell CJ; Janz DR; Rice TW; Prekker ME; Casey JD;
    JAMA; 2021 Dec; 326(24):2488-2497. PubMed ID: 34879143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
    Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Production, Assessment, and Utility of 3D-Printed Video Laryngoscopes in Eastern India: A Low-Cost Alternative to Conventional Video Laryngoscopes.
    Lal Vallath A; Krishnan S; Skikic E; Das T; Banerjee S; Chatterjee A; Dasgupta I
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60386. PubMed ID: 38883021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Trimmel H; Kreutziger J; Fitzka R; Szüts S; Derdak C; Koch E; Erwied B; Voelckel WG
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e470-6. PubMed ID: 27002277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SWIVIT--Swiss video-intubation trial evaluating video-laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway scenario: study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in Switzerland.
    Theiler L; Hermann K; Schoettker P; Savoldelli G; Urwyler N; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Arheart KL; Greif R
    Trials; 2013 Apr; 14():94. PubMed ID: 23556410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Emergency Medicine Trainees by Laryngoscopic Device and Training Year: A National Emergency Airway Registry Study.
    Garcia SI; Sandefur BJ; Campbell RL; Driver BE; April MD; Carlson JN; Walls RM; Brown CA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2023 Jun; 81(6):649-657. PubMed ID: 36669924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol.
    Falempin AS; Pereira B; Binakdane F; Bazin JE; Smirdec M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e029761. PubMed ID: 31685496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Urgent Intubation of Newborn Infants.
    Geraghty LE; Dunne EA; Ní Chathasaigh CM; Vellinga A; Adams NC; O'Currain EM; McCarthy LK; O'Donnell CPF
    N Engl J Med; 2024 May; 390(20):1885-1894. PubMed ID: 38709215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intubation of non-difficult airways using video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a randomized, parallel-group study.
    Liu DX; Ye Y; Zhu YH; Li J; He HY; Dong L; Zhu ZQ
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 May; 19(1):75. PubMed ID: 31092191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.
    Janz DR; Semler MW; Lentz RJ; Matthews DT; Assad TR; Norman BC; Keriwala RD; Ferrell BA; Noto MJ; Shaver CM; Richmond BW; Zinggeler Berg J; Rice TW;
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1980-1987. PubMed ID: 27355526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway.
    Takahashi S; Mizutani T; Miyabe M; Toyooka H
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Aug; 95(2):480-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12145076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Araújo B; Rivera A; Martins S; Abreu R; Cassa P; Silva M; Gallo de Moraes A
    Crit Care; 2024 Jan; 28(1):1. PubMed ID: 38167459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tracheal intubation in the ice-pick position with video laryngoscopes: a randomised controlled trial in a manikin.
    Wetsch WA; Hellmich M; Spelten O; Schier R; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Sep; 30(9):537-43. PubMed ID: 23736089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit: C-MAC video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Dey S; Pradhan D; Saikia P; Bhattacharyya P; Khandelwal H; Adarsha KN
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2020 Apr; 44(3):135-141. PubMed ID: 31780257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
    Mosier J; Chiu S; Patanwala AE; Sakles JC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 61(4):414-420.e1. PubMed ID: 23374414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.