These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36639320)

  • 21. Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database.
    Pastrana M; Stoltzfus J; AlMandini A; El Chaar M
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Jul; 16(7):916-922. PubMed ID: 32340825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictors of 30-day follow-up visit completion after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry.
    Yu Y; Ma Q; Johnson JA; O'Malley WE; Sabbota A; Groth SW
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 Mar; 18(3):384-393. PubMed ID: 34974998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
    Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does accreditation matter? An analysis of complications of bariatric cases using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and National Quality Improvement Program databases.
    Clapp B; Grasso S; Gamez J; Edwards J; Dodoo C; Portela R; Ghanem OM; Davis BR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 May; 18(5):658-665. PubMed ID: 35248482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trends in revisional bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database 2015-2017.
    Clapp B; Harper B; Dodoo C; Klingsporn W; Barrientes A; Cutshall M; Tyroch A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Jul; 16(7):908-915. PubMed ID: 32299713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.
    Nasser H; Munie S; Kindel TL; Gould JC; Higgins RM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Mar; 16(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 31932204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examining the Hispanic paradox in bariatric surgery.
    Sundaresan N; Roberts A; Thompson KJ; McKillop IH; Barbat S; Nimeri A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Oct; 16(10):1392-1400. PubMed ID: 32694042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of smoking on bariatric surgical 30-day outcomes: propensity-score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP.
    Janik MR; Aryaie AH
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3905-3914. PubMed ID: 32728767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Peterli R; Wölnerhanssen BK; Peters T; Vetter D; Kröll D; Borbély Y; Schultes B; Beglinger C; Drewe J; Schiesser M; Nett P; Bueter M
    JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(3):255-265. PubMed ID: 29340679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Status on Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using the MBSAQIP Database.
    Purich K; Mocanu V; Joy J; Verhoeff K; Dang J; Switzer NJ; Birch DW; Karmali S
    Obes Surg; 2022 Jun; 32(6):1944-1953. PubMed ID: 35349044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of short-term outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in male and female patients using the MBSAQIP database.
    Falvo A; Vacharathit V; Kuhn JE; Fluck M; Cunningham RM; Petrick AT; Parker DM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Sep; 16(9):1236-1241. PubMed ID: 32580922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Acevedo E; Lu X; Zhao H; Mazzei M; Sarvepalli S; Edwards MA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Mar; 17(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 33257274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data.
    El Chaar M; Petrick A; Clapp B; Stoltzfus J; Alvarado LA
    Obes Surg; 2023 Jul; 33(7):2025-2039. PubMed ID: 37184827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE PERIOPERATIVE NUTRITION, METABOLIC, AND NONSURGICAL SUPPORT OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC PROCEDURES - 2019 UPDATE: COSPONSORED BY AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, THE OBESITY SOCIETY, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC & BARIATRIC SURGERY, OBESITY MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, AND AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS -
    Mechanick JI; Apovian C; Brethauer S; Garvey WT; Joffe AM; Kim J; Kushner RF; Lindquist R; Pessah-Pollack R; Seger J; Urman RD; Adams S; Cleek JB; Correa R; Figaro MK; Flanders K; Grams J; Hurley DL; Kothari S; Seger MV; Still CD
    Endocr Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(12):1346-1359. PubMed ID: 31682518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Heterogeneity of weight loss after gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding.
    Azagury D; Mokhtari TE; Garcia L; Rosas US; Garg T; Rivas H; Morton J
    Surgery; 2019 Mar; 165(3):565-570. PubMed ID: 30316577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How safe is bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity (body mass index 30-35 kg/m
    Feng X; Andalib A; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR; Aminian A
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Feb; 15(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 30713117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. First Assistant In Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic And Robotic Approaches: A 4-Year Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database (2016-2019).
    Rahimi AO; Hsu CH; Maegawa F; Soliman D; King RJ; Ashouri Y; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2024 Mar; 34(3):866-873. PubMed ID: 38114775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gastroesophageal Reflux Predicts Utilization of Dehydration Treatments After Bariatric Surgery.
    Seymour KA; Turner MC; Kuchibhatla M; Sudan R
    Obes Surg; 2021 Feb; 31(2):838-846. PubMed ID: 33051789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
    Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preoperative weight loss is linked to improved mortality and leaks following elective bariatric surgery: an analysis of 548,597 patients from 2015-2018.
    Mocanu V; Marcil G; Dang JT; Birch DW; Switzer NJ; Karmali S
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Nov; 17(11):1846-1853. PubMed ID: 34330621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.