These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36639760)

  • 21. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
    Kramer LM; Wolc A; Esfandyari H; Thekkoot DM; Zhang C; Kemp RA; Plastow G; Dekkers JCM
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 99(10):. PubMed ID: 34558614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bias and Precision of Parameter Estimates from Models Using Polygenic Scores to Estimate Environmental and Genetic Parental Influences.
    Kim Y; Balbona JV; Keller MC
    Behav Genet; 2021 May; 51(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 33301082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.
    Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.
    de Oliveira LF; Brito LF; Marques DBD; da Silva DA; Lopes PS; Dos Santos CG; Johnson JS; Veroneze R
    BMC Genom Data; 2023 Dec; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38093199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of dam line composition of 3-way crossbred animals using genomic information.
    Calus MPL; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35705918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetic parameters and expected responses to selection for components of feed efficiency in a Duroc pig line.
    Sánchez JP; Ragab M; Quintanilla R; Rothschild MF; Piles M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):86. PubMed ID: 29191169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34223907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?
    Bijma P; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Nov; 46(1):79. PubMed ID: 25407726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relevance of purebred information for predicting genetic merit of survival at birth of crossbred piglets.
    Cecchinato A; de los Campos G; Gianola D; Gallo L; Carnier P
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):481-90. PubMed ID: 19897636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of the mating design on the additive genetic variance in plant breeding populations.
    Lanzl T; Melchinger AE; Schön CC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Oct; 136(11):236. PubMed ID: 37906322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; van der Werf JHJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):783-795. PubMed ID: 31857332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Average semivariance yields accurate estimates of the fraction of marker-associated genetic variance and heritability in complex trait analyses.
    Feldmann MJ; Piepho HP; Bridges WC; Knapp SJ
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009762. PubMed ID: 34437540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.
    Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 28805893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
    Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
    Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of genetic merit for growth rate in pigs using animal models with indirect genetic effects and genomic information.
    Poulsen BG; Ask B; Nielsen HM; Ostersen T; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):58. PubMed ID: 33028188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.