These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36640251)

  • 1. The use of voting ensembles to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to predict embryo ploidy status.
    Jiang VS; Kandula H; Thirumalaraju P; Kanakasabapathy MK; Cherouveim P; Souter I; Dimitriadis I; Bormann CL; Shafiee H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Feb; 40(2):301-308. PubMed ID: 36640251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
    Diakiw SM; Hall JMM; VerMilyea MD; Amin J; Aizpurua J; Giardini L; Briones YG; Lim AYX; Dakka MA; Nguyen TV; Perugini D; Perugini M
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study.
    Barnes J; Brendel M; Gao VR; Rajendran S; Kim J; Li Q; Malmsten JE; Sierra JT; Zisimopoulos P; Sigaras A; Khosravi P; Meseguer M; Zhan Q; Rosenwaks Z; Elemento O; Zaninovic N; Hajirasouliha I
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Jan; 5(1):e28-e40. PubMed ID: 36543475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 12 machine learning models developed to predict ploidy, using a morphokinetic meta-dataset of 8147 embryos.
    Bamford T; Easter C; Montgomery S; Smith R; Dhillon-Smith RK; Barrie A; Campbell A; Coomarasamy A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):569-581. PubMed ID: 36825452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved clinical utility of preimplantation genetic testing through the integration of ploidy and common pathogenic microdeletions analyses.
    Caroselli S; Figliuzzi M; Picchetta L; Cogo F; Zambon P; Pergher I; Girardi L; Patassini C; Poli M; Bakalova D; Cimadomo D; Findikli N; Coban O; Serdarogullari M; Favero F; Bortolato S; Anastasi A; Capodanno F; Gallinelli A; Brancati F; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM; Jimenez-Almazán J; Blesa-Jarque D; Miravet-Valenciano J; Rubio C; Simòn C; Capalbo A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):762-775. PubMed ID: 36824049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts.
    Popovic M; Borot L; Lorenzon AR; Lopes ALRC; Sakkas D; Lledó B; Morales R; Ortiz JA; Polyzos NP; Parriego M; Azpiroz F; Galain M; Pujol A; Menten B; Dhaenens L; Vanden Meerschaut F; Stoop D; Rodriguez M; de la Blanca EP; Rodríguez A; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):258-274. PubMed ID: 37873575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
    Palmerola KL; Vitez SF; Amrane S; Fischer CP; Forman EJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 30362056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antimüllerian hormone is not associated with embryo ploidy in patients with and without infertility undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing.
    Stovezky YR; Romanski PA; Bortoletto P; Spandorfer SD
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Mar; 119(3):444-453. PubMed ID: 36423663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations between clinical parameters, blastocyst morphological classification and embryo euploidy.
    Scheffer JB; Carvalho RF; Scheffer BB; Aguiar APS; Pessoa LP; Lozano DM; Fanchin R
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2024 Feb; 28(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 37962968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better.
    Girardi L; Figliuzzi M; Poli M; Serdarogullari M; Patassini C; Caroselli S; Pergher I; Cogo F; Coban O; Boynukalin FK; Bahceci M; Navarro R; Rubio C; Findikli N; Simón C; Capalbo A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):982-991. PubMed ID: 36928183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the combination of time-lapse parameters and clinical features predict embryonic ploidy status or implantation?
    Zou Y; Pan Y; Ge N; Xu Y; Gu R; Li Z; Fu J; Gao J; Sun X; Sun Y
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Oct; 45(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 35918244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence, dynamics and recurrences of reverse cleavage in aneuploid, mosaic and euploid blastocysts, and its relationship with embryo quality.
    Jin L; Dong X; Tan W; Huang B
    J Ovarian Res; 2022 Aug; 15(1):91. PubMed ID: 35932054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associations between the artificial intelligence scoring system and live birth outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.
    Lee CI; Huang CC; Lee TH; Chen HH; Cheng EH; Lin PY; Yu TN; Chen CI; Chen CH; Lee MS
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2024 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 38233926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.
    Li X; Hao Y; Chen D; Ji D; Zhu W; Zhu X; Wei Z; Cao Y; Zhang Z; Zhou P
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):2020-2034. PubMed ID: 33974705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-invasive, label-free optical analysis to detect aneuploidy within the inner cell mass of the preimplantation embryo.
    Tan TCY; Mahbub SB; Campbell JM; Habibalahi A; Campugan CA; Rose RD; Chow DJX; Mustafa S; Goldys EM; Dunning KR
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Dec; 37(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 34741175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst.
    Victor AR; Griffin DK; Brake AJ; Tyndall JC; Murphy AE; Lepkowsky LT; Lal A; Zouves CG; Barnes FL; McCoy RC; Viotti M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 30418565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early blastocyst expansion in euploid and aneuploid human embryos: evidence for a non-invasive and quantitative marker for embryo selection.
    Huang TT; Huang DH; Ahn HJ; Arnett C; Huang CT
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Jul; 39(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 31130402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The human embryonic genome is karyotypically complex, with chromosomally abnormal cells preferentially located away from the developing fetus.
    Griffin DK; Brezina PR; Tobler K; Zhao Y; Silvestri G; Mccoy RC; Anchan R; Benner A; Cutting GR; Kearns WG
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jan; 38(1):180-188. PubMed ID: 36350568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge-embedded spatio-temporal analysis for euploidy embryos identification in couples with chromosomal rearrangements.
    Chen F; Xie X; Cai D; Yan P; Ding C; Wen Y; Xu Y; Gao F; Zhou C; Li G; Mai Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2024 Mar; 137(6):694-703. PubMed ID: 37640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.