227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36640460)
1. An optical and acoustic investigation of microbubble cavitation in small channels under therapeutic ultrasound conditions.
Zhao X; Wright A; Goertz DE
Ultrason Sonochem; 2023 Feb; 93():106291. PubMed ID: 36640460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superharmonic microbubble Doppler effect in ultrasound therapy.
Pouliopoulos AN; Choi JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6154-71. PubMed ID: 27469394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo high-speed microscopy of microbubbles in the chorioallantoic membrane model.
Anbarafshan R; Pellow C; Kiezun K; Leong H; Goertz DE
Theranostics; 2024; 14(5):1794-1814. PubMed ID: 38505609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploiting flow to control the in vitro spatiotemporal distribution of microbubble-seeded acoustic cavitation activity in ultrasound therapy.
Pouliopoulos AN; Bonaccorsi S; Choi JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6941-57. PubMed ID: 25350470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-linear Acoustic Emissions from Therapeutically Driven Contrast Agent Microbubbles.
Song JH; Moldovan A; Prentice P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):2188-2204. PubMed ID: 31085030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic Behavior of Microbubbles during Long Ultrasound Tone-Burst Excitation: Mechanistic Insights into Ultrasound-Microbubble Mediated Therapeutics Using High-Speed Imaging and Cavitation Detection.
Chen X; Wang J; Pacella JJ; Villanueva FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):528-538. PubMed ID: 26603628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbubble type and distribution dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.
Wang S; Samiotaki G; Olumolade O; Feshitan JA; Konofagou EE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 24239362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intravital imaging and cavitation monitoring of antivascular ultrasound in tumor microvasculature.
Zhao X; Pellow C; Goertz DE
Theranostics; 2023; 13(1):250-266. PubMed ID: 36593952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical monitoring of ultrasound-induced bioeffects in glass catfish.
Maruvada S; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 14962610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.
Sassaroli E; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 17590501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles.
Tung YS; Choi JJ; Baseri B; Konofagou EE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):840-52. PubMed ID: 20420973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.
Arvanitis CD; McDannold N
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112901. PubMed ID: 24320468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.
Burgess MT; Porter TM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):846-858. PubMed ID: 30638968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring of acoustic cavitation in microbubble-presented focused ultrasound exposure using gradient-echo MRI.
Wu CH; Liu HL; Ho CT; Hsu PH; Fan CH; Yeh CK; Kang ST; Chen WS; Wang FN; Peng HH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):311-318. PubMed ID: 31125166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cavitation Characterization of Size-Isolated Microbubbles in a Vessel Phantom Using Focused Ultrasound.
Martinez P; Bottenus N; Borden M
Pharmaceutics; 2022 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 36145673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of acoustic parameters on the cavitation behavior of SonoVue microbubbles induced by pulsed ultrasound.
Lin Y; Lin L; Cheng M; Jin L; Du L; Han T; Xu L; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrason Sonochem; 2017 Mar; 35(Pt A):176-184. PubMed ID: 27707644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elastic Deformation of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Materials Using a Single Microbubble and Acoustic Radiation Force.
Bezer JH; Koruk H; Rowlands CJ; Choi JJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3327-3338. PubMed ID: 32919812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluid Viscosity Affects the Fragmentation and Inertial Cavitation Threshold of Lipid-Encapsulated Microbubbles.
Helfield B; Black JJ; Qin B; Pacella J; Chen X; Villanueva FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):782-94. PubMed ID: 26674676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
