These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36640669)
1. Life cycle assessment of waste management in rural areas in the transition period from mixed collection to source-separation. Liao N; Lü F; Zhang H; He P Waste Manag; 2023 Mar; 158():57-65. PubMed ID: 36640669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R; Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK. Jeswani HK; Azapagic A Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran. Zarea MA; Moazed H; Ahmadmoazzam M; Malekghasemi S; Jaafarzadeh N Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Feb; 191(3):131. PubMed ID: 30725189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle assessment of capital goods in waste management systems. Brogaard LK; Christensen TH Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():561-74. PubMed ID: 27478026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout. Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental impact assessment of the current, emerging, and alternative waste management systems using life cycle assessment tools: a case study of Johannesburg, South Africa. Adeleke O; Akinlabi SA; Jen TC; Dunmade I Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):7366-7381. PubMed ID: 34476692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Global warming potential of typical rural domestic waste treatment modes in China: a case study in Ankang. Guo H; Nie X; Shu T; Li X; Bai B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):47149-47161. PubMed ID: 33890212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life cycle assessment of potential municipal solid waste management strategies for Mumbai, India. Sharma BK; Chandel MK Waste Manag Res; 2017 Jan; 35(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 27872406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental impact evaluation of landfill mining of legacy waste with on-site sorting using life cycle assessment. Cheela VRS; John M; Biswas W; Dubey B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):30033-30047. PubMed ID: 36418834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations. Anshassi M; Smallwood T; Townsend TG Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 142():44-54. PubMed ID: 35176598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Megacity's pathway toward sustainable food waste management and its environmental performance in a developing country: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Xiao J; Tao T; Shi Y; Zhao J; Wu B; Tai J; Xu M; Zhang X; Peng Y; Bi Z; Feng D; Qian G Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164706. PubMed ID: 37301380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China. Dong J; Chi Y; Zou D; Fu C; Huang Q; Ni M Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24163375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of waste processing byproducts on the carbon footprint of integrated waste-to-energy strategies. Abdallah M; Elfeky A J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111839. PubMed ID: 33360739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil. Martin EJP; Oliveira DSBL; Oliveira LSBL; Bezerra BS Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():226-234. PubMed ID: 33075619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures. Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Areas on which to focus when seeking to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of commercial waste management. A case study of a hypermarket, Finland. Hupponen M; Grönman K; Horttanainen M Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():1-18. PubMed ID: 29576513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of waste-to-energy options in landfill-dominated countries: Economic evaluation and GHG impact. Aracil C; Haro P; Fuentes-Cano D; Gómez-Barea A Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():443-456. PubMed ID: 29610061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and the feed-in tariff system of waste-to-energy facilities using a system dynamics model. Chen YC; Liu HM Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148445. PubMed ID: 34147799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental and economic assessments of industry-level medical waste disposal technologies - A case study of ten Chinese megacities. Ji A; Guan J; Zhang S; Ma X; Jing S; Yan G; Liu Y; Li H; Zhao H Waste Manag; 2024 Feb; 174():203-217. PubMed ID: 38061188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]