These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36641700)

  • 1. Verification of temperature, wind and precipitation fields for the high-resolution WRF NMM model over the complex terrain of Montenegro.
    Zečević A; Filipović L; Marčev A
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(4):1525-1539. PubMed ID: 36641700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model for Improving WRF Simulations.
    Sayeed A; Choi Y; Jung J; Lops Y; Eslami E; Salman AK
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2023 Feb; 34(2):750-760. PubMed ID: 34375287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of parameterization of physical processes on simulation of track and intensity of tropical cyclone Nargis (2008) with WRF-NMM model.
    Pattanayak S; Mohanty UC; Osuri KK
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():671437. PubMed ID: 22701366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of thunderstorm simulations from WRF-NMM and WRF-ARW models over East Indian Region.
    Litta AJ; Mary Ididcula S; Mohanty UC; Kiran Prasad S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():951870. PubMed ID: 22645480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of HWRF, ARW and NMM models in Hurricane Katrina (2005) simulation.
    Dodla VB; Desamsetti S; Yerramilli A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Jun; 8(6):2447-69. PubMed ID: 21776239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with regional coastal ecosystem model to simulate the hypoxic conditions.
    Hafeez MA; Nakamura Y; Suzuki T; Inoue T; Matsuzaki Y; Wang K; Moiz A
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 771():145290. PubMed ID: 33545475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation and evaluation of WRF simulation over a city with complex terrain using Alos-Palsar 0.4 s topography.
    Guevara Luna MA; Casallas A; Belalcázar Cerón LC; Clappier A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):37818-37838. PubMed ID: 32613506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FleaTickRisk: a meteorological model developed to monitor and predict the activity and density of three tick species and the cat flea in Europe.
    Beugnet F; Chalvet-Monfray K; Loukos H
    Geospat Health; 2009 Nov; 4(1):97-113. PubMed ID: 19908193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulating the meteorology and PM
    Hyde P; Mahalov A; Li J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Mar; 68(3):177-195. PubMed ID: 28738173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Weather Forecast Model Accuracy Analysis and ECMWF Enhancement Proposal by Neural Network.
    Frnda J; Durica M; Nedoma J; Zabka S; Martinek R; Kostelansky M
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 31771275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of NU-WRF rainfall forecasts for IFloodS.
    Wu D; Peters-Lidard C; Tao WK; Petersen W
    J Hydrometeorol; 2016 May; 17(5):1317-1335. PubMed ID: 32747857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a seven-year air quality simulation using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models in the eastern United States.
    Zhang H; Chen G; Hu J; Chen SH; Wiedinmyer C; Kleeman M; Ying Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():275-85. PubMed ID: 24374589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving of local ozone forecasting by integrated models.
    Gradišar D; Grašič B; Božnar MZ; Mlakar P; Kocijan J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(18):18439-50. PubMed ID: 27287489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical Forecast Correction of Temperature and Wind Using a Single-Station Single-Time Spatial LightGBM Method.
    Tang R; Ning Y; Li C; Feng W; Chen Y; Xie X
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 35009735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the effects of LUCCs on local temperatures, precipitation, and wind using the WRF model.
    Lian L; Li B; Chen Y; Chu C; Qin Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Sep; 189(10):501. PubMed ID: 28894965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of greenery enhancements for the resilience to heat waves: A comparison of analysis performed through mesoscale (WRF) and microscale (Envi-met) modeling.
    Berardi U; Jandaghian Z; Graham J
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 747():141300. PubMed ID: 32791415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten ensembles with hourly high spatial resolution datasets for severe precipitation events in Egypt.
    Eltahan M; Alahmadi S; Moharm K; Magooda M
    Data Brief; 2020 Aug; 31():105987. PubMed ID: 32685636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring atmospheric stagnation during a severe particulate matter air pollution episode over complex terrain in Santiago, Chile.
    Toro A R; Kvakić M; Klaić ZB; Koračin D; Morales S RGE; Leiva G MA
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Jan; 244():705-714. PubMed ID: 30384076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Mesoscale Meteorological Model (MM5)-Community Multi-Scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) performance in hindcast and forecast of ground-level ozone.
    Nghiem le H; Kim Oanh NT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Oct; 58(10):1341-50. PubMed ID: 18939781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry-meteorology feedbacks on air quality.
    Wang K; Zhang Y; Yu S; Wong DC; Pleim J; Mathur R; Kelly JT; Bell M
    Geosci Model Dev; 2021 Nov; 14(11):7189-7221. PubMed ID: 35237388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.