136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36642117)
1. Mending the Gap: AlloDerm as a Safe and Effective Option for Vaginal Canal Lining in Revision Robotic Assisted Gender Affirming Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty.
Parker A; Brydges H; Blasdel G; Bluebond-Langner R; Zhao LC
Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():204-208. PubMed ID: 36642117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Peritoneal Flap Revision of Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty: a Novel Technique for Treating Neovaginal Stenosis.
Dy GW; Blasdel G; Shakir NA; Bluebond-Langner R; Zhao LC
Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():308-314. PubMed ID: 33823174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genital Hypoplasia before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Does the Robotic Peritoneal Flap Method Create Equivalent Vaginal Canal Outcomes?
Blasdel G; Kloer C; Parker A; Shakir N; Zhao LC; Bluebond-Langner R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):867-874. PubMed ID: 36729740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Alternative Option for Gender-Affirming Revision Vaginoplasty: The Tubularized Urachus-Peritoneal Hinge Flap.
Smith SM; Yuan N; Stelmar J; Pa-C GL; Gupta A; Kim HL; Garcia MM
Sex Med; 2022 Dec; 10(6):100572. PubMed ID: 36183656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The robotic-assisted free jejunal flap for neovaginal canal creation in gender-affirming vaginoplasties.
Del Corral GA; Chang BL; Lava CX; Li KR; Lisle DM
Microsurgery; 2024 Jul; 44(5):e31202. PubMed ID: 38887138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender-affirming vaginoplasty: Technical considerations in patients with genital skin deficiency.
Huang JB; Lai A; Morgantini LA; Smith JB; Millman AL; Cedeno JD; Crivellaro S; Acar O; Kocjancic E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Jun; 42(5):947-955. PubMed ID: 36378843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Gender Affirming Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty Using the Da Vinci Single Port Versus Xi Robotic Systems.
Dy GW; Jun MS; Blasdel G; Bluebond-Langner R; Zhao LC
Eur Urol; 2021 May; 79(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 32624272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal Canal Reconstruction in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty with Flaps, Peritoneum, or Skin Grafts: Where Is the Evidence?
Salibian AA; Schechter LS; Kuzon WM; Bouman MB; van der Sluis WB; Zhao LC; Bluebond-Langner R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Apr; 147(4):634e-643e. PubMed ID: 33776039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic Davydov Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Augmentation of Vaginal Depth in Feminizing Vaginoplasty.
Jacoby A; Maliha S; Granieri MA; Cohen O; Dy GW; Bluebond-Langner R; Zhao LC
J Urol; 2019 Jun; 201(6):1171-1176. PubMed ID: 30707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin Management During Robotic Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Penoscrotal Hypoplasia Secondary to Pubertal Suppression.
Dy GW; Dugi DD; Peters BR
Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():226-227. PubMed ID: 36592702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.
Peters BR; Martin LH; Butler C; Dugi D; Dy GW
Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Oct; 23(10):211-218. PubMed ID: 36040679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue Options for Construction of the Neovaginal Canal in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.
Bene NC; Ferrin PC; Xu J; Dy GW; Dugi D; Peters BR
J Clin Med; 2024 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 38792302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single Port and Multiport Approaches for Robotic Vaginoplasty With the Davydov Technique.
Acar O; Sofer L; Dobbs RW; Greenwald DT; Halgrimson WR; Crivellaro S; Kocjancic E
Urology; 2020 Apr; 138():166-173. PubMed ID: 31904396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopy Assisted Peritoneal Pull-Through Vaginoplasty in Transgender Women.
Castanon CDG; Matic S; Bizic M; Stojanovic B; Bencic M; Grubor N; Pusica S; Korac G; Djordjevic ML
Urology; 2022 Aug; 166():301-302. PubMed ID: 35550383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of Integra Dermal Regeneration Template in the surgical management of revision penile inversion vaginoplasty: A case series.
Sanchez Figueroa N; Zheng E; Kuruoglu D; Martinez-Jorge J
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():91-97. PubMed ID: 37826968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acellular human dermal matrix as a skin substitute for reconstruction of large periocular cutaneous defects.
Levin F; Turbin RE; Langer PD
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21217334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External Genital Revisions after Gender-Affirming Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: Surgical Assessment, Techniques, and Outcomes.
Dy GW; Salibian AA; Blasdel G; Zhao LC; Bluebond-Langner R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 149(6):1429-1438. PubMed ID: 35426889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmentation vaginoplasty with buccal mucosa for the surgical revision of postreconstructive vaginal stenosis: a case series.
Learner HI; Creighton SM; Wood D
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Aug; 15(4):402.e1-402.e7. PubMed ID: 31351946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Penile and Scrotal Skin Measurements to Predict Final Vaginal Depth With Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.
Smith SM; Yuan N; Stelmar J; Zaliznyak M; Lee G; Bresee C; Garcia MM
Sex Med; 2022 Dec; 10(6):100569. PubMed ID: 36152492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-institution outcome experience using AlloDerm® as temporary coverage or definitive reconstruction for cutaneous and soft tissue malignancy defects.
Deneve JL; Turaga KK; Marzban SS; Puleo CA; Sarnaik AA; Gonzalez RJ; Sondak VK; Zager JS
Am Surg; 2013 May; 79(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 23635582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
