These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36642768)

  • 1. Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li X; Yan L; Li D; Fan Z; Liu H; Wang G; Jiu J; Yang Z; Li JJ; Wang B
    Int Orthop; 2023 Mar; 47(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 36642768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trauma and femoral tunnel position are the most common failure modes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
    Vermeijden HD; Yang XA; van der List JP; DiFelice GS; Rademakers MV; Kerkhoffs GMMJ
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Nov; 28(11):3666-3675. PubMed ID: 32691095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral Tunnel Drilling Method: Risk of Reoperation and Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Tejwani SG; Prentice HA; Wyatt RWB; Maletis GB
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3378-3384. PubMed ID: 30419174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Press-fit fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields low graft failure and revision rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shanmugaraj A; Mahendralingam M; Gohal C; Horner N; Simunovic N; Musahl V; Samuelsson K; Ayeni OR
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jun; 29(6):1750-1759. PubMed ID: 32785757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Outcomes After Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients From the SANTI Study Group.
    Pioger C; Gousopoulos L; Hopper GP; Vieira TD; Campos JP; El Helou A; Philippe C; Saithna A; Sonnery-Cottet B
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Nov; 50(13):3493-3501. PubMed ID: 36255278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhao D; Pan JK; Lin FZ; Luo MH; Liang GH; Zeng LF; Huang HT; Han YH; Xu NJ; Yang WY; Liu J
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Sep; 51(11):3053-3075. PubMed ID: 36189967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-Related Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 21,304 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry.
    Maletis GB; Chen J; Inacio MC; Funahashi TT
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26637284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Xie X; Liu X; Chen Z; Yu Y; Peng S; Li Q
    Knee; 2015 Mar; 22(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 25547048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.
    Mouarbes D; Menetrey J; Marot V; Courtot L; Berard E; Cavaignac E
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3531-3540. PubMed ID: 30790526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Gopinatth V; Casanova FJ; Knapik DM; Mameri ES; Jackson GR; Khan ZA; McCormick JR; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Chahla J
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Sep; 39(9):2098-2111. PubMed ID: 36863622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of different autografts used for all-epiphyseal, partial epiphyseal or transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients - a systematic review.
    Verhagen S; Dietvorst M; Delvaux E; van der Steen MC; Janssen R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Aug; 24(1):630. PubMed ID: 37537529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.
    Samuelsen BT; Webster KE; Johnson NR; Hewett TE; Krych AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2459-2468. PubMed ID: 28205075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Dai W; Leng X; Wang J; Cheng J; Hu X; Ao Y
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Oct; 50(12):3425-3439. PubMed ID: 34494906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.
    Rayes J; Ouanezar H; Haidar IM; Ngbilo C; Fradin T; Vieira TD; Freychet B; Sonnery-Cottet B
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Feb; 50(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 34898285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.
    Aga C; Kartus JT; Lind M; Lygre SHL; Granan LP; Engebretsen L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2503-2512. PubMed ID: 28631112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.
    Snaebjörnsson T; Hamrin Senorski E; Ayeni OR; Alentorn-Geli E; Krupic F; Norberg F; Karlsson J; Samuelsson K
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(9):2092-2097. PubMed ID: 28460194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tunnel osteolysis post-ACL reconstruction: a systematic review examining select diagnostic modalities, treatment options and rehabilitation protocols.
    Bhullar R; Habib A; Zhang K; de Sa D; Horner NS; Duong A; Simunovic N; Espregueira-Mendes J; Ayeni OR
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Feb; 27(2):524-533. PubMed ID: 30242452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Associated With an Intra-articular Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Single-Institution Cohort Study.
    Marom N; Kapadia M; Nguyen JT; Ammerman B; Boyle C; Wolfe I; Halvorsen KC; Miller AO; Henry MW; Brause BD; Hannafin JA; Marx RG; Ranawat AS
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Apr; 50(5):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 35286225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which graft has a higher contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury rate?: A meta-analysis of 5561 patients following the PRISMA guidelines.
    Zhou P; Liu JC; Deng XT; Li Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21540. PubMed ID: 32756207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with high revision rates: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Registry.
    Lind M; Strauss MJ; Nielsen T; Engebretsen L
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Jul; 28(7):2163-2169. PubMed ID: 31641810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.