These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36644814)

  • 41. Simulation of the Slip Velocity Effect in an AC Electrothermal Micropump.
    Echouchene F; Al-Shahrani T; Belmabrouk H
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32878031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of volume- and time-based constraints on capture of analytes in microfluidic heterogeneous immunoassays.
    Parsa H; Chin CD; Mongkolwisetwara P; Lee BW; Wang JJ; Sia SK
    Lab Chip; 2008 Dec; 8(12):2062-70. PubMed ID: 19023469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rapid, automated, parallel quantitative immunoassays using highly integrated microfluidics and AlphaLISA.
    Yu ZT; Guan H; Cheung MK; McHugh WM; Cornell TT; Shanley TP; Kurabayashi K; Fu J
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11339. PubMed ID: 26074253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fluid mixing using AC electrothermal flow on meandering electrodes in a microchannel.
    Sasaki N; Kitamori T; Kim HB
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Sep; 33(17):2668-73. PubMed ID: 22965710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of reagents.
    Song H; Ismagilov RF
    J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Nov; 125(47):14613-9. PubMed ID: 14624612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improvements in mixing time and mixing uniformity in devices designed for studies of protein folding kinetics.
    Yao S; Bakajin O
    Anal Chem; 2007 Aug; 79(15):5753-9. PubMed ID: 17583912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Materials for Microfluidic Immunoassays: A Review.
    Mou L; Jiang X
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2017 Aug; 6(15):. PubMed ID: 28322517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A digital microfluidic approach to heterogeneous immunoassays.
    Miller EM; Ng AH; Uddayasankar U; Wheeler AR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2011 Jan; 399(1):337-45. PubMed ID: 21057776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Immunoassays in microfluidic systems.
    Ng AH; Uddayasankar U; Wheeler AR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Jun; 397(3):991-1007. PubMed ID: 20422163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Capillary-Driven Microfluidic Chips for Miniaturized Immunoassays: Efficient Fabrication and Sealing of Chips Using a "Chip-Olate" Process.
    Temiz Y; Delamarche E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1547():25-36. PubMed ID: 28044284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Alternating current electrokinetics enhanced in situ capacitive immunoassay.
    Li S; Ren Y; Cui H; Yuan Q; Wu J; Eda S; Jiang H
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Feb; 36(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 25258204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Computer design of microfluidic mixers for protein/RNA folding studies.
    Inguva V; Kathuria SV; Bilsel O; Perot BJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198534. PubMed ID: 29924842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Precision-scored parental report questions and HL-scaled tympanometry as informative measures of hearing in otitis media 1: Large-sample evidence on determinants and complementarity to pure-tone audiometry.
    Milovanovic J; Filipovic SA; Marchisio P; Haggard MP; Zhang MF; Spencer H;
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():113-31. PubMed ID: 26968065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mixing enhancement of the passive microfluidic mixer with J-shaped baffles in the tee channel.
    Lin YC; Chung YC; Wu CY
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Apr; 9(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 17165126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Time-resolved particle image velocimetry analysis and computational modeling of transient optically induced electrothermal micro vortex.
    Gupta K; Chen Z; Williams SJ; Wereley ST
    Electrophoresis; 2021 Dec; 42(23):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 34409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Automated Droplet-Based Microfluidic Platform for Multiplexed Analysis of Biochemical Markers in Small Volumes.
    Cedillo-Alcantar DF; Han YD; Choi J; Garcia-Cordero JL; Revzin A
    Anal Chem; 2019 Apr; 91(8):5133-5141. PubMed ID: 30834743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Electrothermal flow on electrodes arrays at physiological conductivities.
    Koklu A; Tansel O; Oksuzoglu H; Sabuncu AC
    IET Nanobiotechnol; 2016 Apr; 10(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 27074854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs.
    Sun T; Green NG; Gawad S; Morgan H
    IET Nanobiotechnol; 2007 Oct; 1(5):69-79. PubMed ID: 17764376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Printed Electrodes in Microfluidic Arrays for Cancer Biomarker Protein Detection.
    Dhanapala L; Krause CE; Jones AL; Rusling JF
    Biosensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32906644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dual frequency dielectrophoresis with interdigitated sidewall electrodes for microfluidic flow-through separation of beads and cells.
    Wang L; Lu J; Marchenko SA; Monuki ES; Flanagan LA; Lee AP
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Mar; 30(5):782-91. PubMed ID: 19197906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.