296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36644857)
21. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Reconstruction of acetabular defect with wire mesh and impacted bone graft in cemented acetabular revision].
Lian YY; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Zhang H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 87(23):1603-6. PubMed ID: 17803848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mid-Term Results of Graft Augmentation Prosthesis II Cage and Impacted Allograft Bone in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
Hosny HAH; El-Bakoury A; Fekry H; Keenan J
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1487-1493. PubMed ID: 29310917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mid-term Follow-up of the Direct Anterior Approach in Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Reconstruction Cage With Impaction Grafting.
Thaler M; Dammerer D; Leitner H; Lindtner RA; Nogler M
J Arthroplasty; 2020 May; 35(5):1339-1343. PubMed ID: 31992528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and allogeneic structural bone graft.
Fujimoto Y; Nakamura S; Ijuin T; Iuchi T; Nakajo M; Taniguchi N
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(2):10225536221119719. PubMed ID: 35976732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
Makita H; Kerboull M; Inaba Y; Tezuka T; Saito T; Kerboull L
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Acetabular revision with impacted irradiated frozen allografts].
Wang Q; Zhang XL; Jiang Y; Chen YS; Shen H; Shao JJ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1045-9. PubMed ID: 21055105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.
Xiao Q; Wang H; Zhou K; Wang D; Ling T; Pei F; Zhou Z
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 31699067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.
Park KS; Seon JK; Lee KB; Kim SK; Chan CK; Yoon TR
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 27546473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
Gibon E; Barut N; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.
Stigbrand H; Gustafsson O; Ullmark G
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 29153632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients.
Busch V; Klarenbeek R; Slooff T; Schreurs BW; Gardeniers J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3214-20. PubMed ID: 20405346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.
Schreurs BW; Thien TM; de Waal Malefijt MC; Buma P; Veth RP; Slooff TJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 12672840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cemented acetabular components combined with trabecular metal augments provide excellent long-term survivorship for severe acetabular bone loss.
Garala K; Remtulla MA; Verma R; Lawrence T
Hip Int; 2023 Sep; 33(5):833-838. PubMed ID: 35658637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
