These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36644976)
1. Evaluation of an interphalangeal-joint prosthetic hand in trans-radial prosthesis users. Sutthison N; Sasaki K; Guerra G; Chaisumritchoke S; Niamsang W; Charatrungolan T Ann Med; 2023 Dec; 55(1):447-455. PubMed ID: 36644976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA. Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb Veteran prosthesis users: a normative study. Resnik L; Borgia M; Cancio J; Heckman J; Highsmith J; Levy C; Phillips S; Webster J Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(11):2470-2481. PubMed ID: 33073621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey. Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upper- and lower-limb amputees show reduced levels of eeriness for images of prosthetic hands. Buckingham G; Parr J; Wood G; Day S; Chadwell A; Head J; Galpin A; Kenney L; Kyberd P; Gowen E; Poliakoff E Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1295-1302. PubMed ID: 31183744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of users of multi-articulating externally powered prostheses with and without their device. Wanamaker AB; Whelan LR; Farley J; Chaudhari AM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Dec; 43(6):618-628. PubMed ID: 31466507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of the Cybathlon 2020 experience for a prosthetic hand user: a case study on the Hannes system. Caserta G; Boccardo N; Freddolini M; Barresi G; Marinelli A; Canepa M; Stedman S; Lombardi L; Laffranchi M; Gruppioni E; De Michieli L J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 35787721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type. Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of Upper Limb Isometric Force Control Abilities for Evaluating Upper Limb Functions Among Prosthetic Users. Lee JH; Oh YE; Lee HJ; Kim K; Lee SJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():2559-2568. PubMed ID: 34874863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise? Kerver N; Schuurmans V; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):22. PubMed ID: 36793049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks. Touillet A; Billon-Grumillier C; Pierret J; Herbe P; Martinet N; Loiret I; Paysant J PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0272855. PubMed ID: 36730223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial prostheses: Trends in development of hardware and control systems. Semasinghe CL; Madusanka DGK; Ranaweera RKPS; Gopura RARC Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1960. PubMed ID: 30248231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current and emerging prostheses for partial hand amputation: A narrative review. Kim GM; Powell JE; Lacey SA; Butkus JA; Smith DG PM R; 2023 Mar; 15(3):392-401. PubMed ID: 35038226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test. Haverkate L; Smit G; Plettenburg DH Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25336050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control. Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Stein RB; Walley M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment. Ontario Health (Quality) Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Restoring Form and Function to the Partial Hand Amputee: Prosthetic Options from the Fingertip to the Palm. Graham EM; Hendrycks R; Baschuk CM; Atkins DJ; Keizer L; Duncan CC; Mendenhall SD Hand Clin; 2021 Feb; 37(1):167-187. PubMed ID: 33198915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Greater and More Natural Use of the Upper Limbs During Everyday Life by Former Amputees Versus Prosthesis Users. Frey S; Motawar B; Buchanan K; Kaufman C; Stevens P; Cirstea C; Morrow S Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2022 Mar; 36(3):227-238. PubMed ID: 34996313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]