152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36645163)
1. Interobserver reproducibility of cribriform cancer in prostate needle biopsies and validation of International Society of Urological Pathology criteria.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Iczkowski KA; van der Kwast T; van Leenders GJLH; Leite KRM; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Tsuzuki T; Mulliqi N; Ji X; Olsson H; Valkonen M; Ruusuvuori P; Eklund M; Kartasalo K
Histopathology; 2023 May; 82(6):837-845. PubMed ID: 36645163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology.
Latour M; Amin MB; Billis A; Egevad L; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Reuter VE; Sakr WA; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Yang XJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1532-9. PubMed ID: 18724248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer.
Czaja RC; Tarima S; Wu R; Palagnmonthip W; Iczkowski KA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151725. PubMed ID: 33610958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Ericson KJ; Wu SS; Lundy SD; Thomas LJ; Klein EA; McKenney JK
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31483693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cribriform prostate cancer: Morphologic criteria enabling a diagnosis, based on survey of experts.
Iczkowski KA; van Leenders GJLH; Tarima S; Wu R; Van der Kwast T; Berney DM; Evans AJ; Wheeler TM; Ro JY; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Srigley J; Varma M; Tsuzuki T; Egevad L
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151733. PubMed ID: 33780691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical cribriform lesions of the prostate: relationship to prostatic carcinoma and implication for diagnosis in prostate biopsies.
Shah RB; Magi-Galluzzi C; Han B; Zhou M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Apr; 34(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 20182345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver reproducibility of percent Gleason grade 4/5 in prostate biopsies.
Glaessgen A; Hamberg H; Pihl CG; Sundelin B; Nilsson B; Egevad L
J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):664-7. PubMed ID: 14713782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The New Realization About Cribriform Prostate Cancer.
Iczkowski KA; Paner GP; Van der Kwast T
Adv Anat Pathol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28820750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
