These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36647209)

  • 1. Audit of fetal biometry: understanding sources of error to improve our practice.
    Papastefanou I; Nicolaides KH; Salomon LJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 61(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 36647209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Wright D; Wright A; Smith E; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 31682299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to avoid errors when computing reference interval tables and graphs using regression equations for cross-sectional studies of fetal biometry.
    DeVore GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 60(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 35132716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal hemodynamics, fetal biometry and Doppler indices in pregnancies followed up for suspected fetal growth restriction.
    Roberts LA; Ling HZ; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH; Kametas NA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 52(4):507-514. PubMed ID: 29607557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between pre-pregnancy body mass index and maternal visceral adiposity with fetal biometry during the second trimester.
    Lopes KRM; Souza ASR; Figueiroa JN; Alves JGB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 138(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 28485827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?
    Chervenak FA; Skupski DW; Romero R; Myers MK; Smith-Levitin M; Rosenwaks Z; Thaler HT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 178(4):678-87. PubMed ID: 9579429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A pragmatic comparison of fetal biometry curves].
    Dhombres F; Massoud M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2023; 51(11-12):524-530. PubMed ID: 37739067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal biometry: Relevance in obstetrical practice.
    Žaliūnas B; Bartkevičienė D; Drąsutienė G; Utkus A; Kurmanavičius J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2017; 53(6):357-364. PubMed ID: 29482879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
    Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
    Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference biometry of foetal brain by prenatal MRI and the distribution of measurements in foetuses with ventricular septal defect.
    Xia F; Guo Y; He H; Chen P; Shao J; Xia W
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 34414830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second-trimester cardiovascular biometry in growth-restricted fetuses; a multicenter cohort study.
    Frandsen JS; Gadsbøll K; Jørgensen FS; Petersen OB; Rode L; Sundberg K; Zingenberg H; Tabor A; Ekelund CK; Vedel C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):81.e1-81.e13. PubMed ID: 34951985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice.
    March MI; Warsof SL; Chauhan SP
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 55(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 22343244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic approach to fetal microcephaly.
    Leibovitz Z; Lerman-Sagie T
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2018 Nov; 22(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 29970280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence assistance for fetal development: evaluation of an automated software for biometry measurements in the mid-trimester.
    Han X; Yu J; Yang X; Chen C; Zhou H; Qiu C; Cao Y; Zhang T; Peng M; Zhu G; Ni D; Zhang Y; Liu N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb; 24(1):158. PubMed ID: 38395822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ISPD 2022 debate-When offering a first trimester ultrasound at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks, a detailed review of fetal anatomy should be included.
    Hui L; Johnson JA; Norton ME
    Prenat Diagn; 2023 Apr; 43(4):421-427. PubMed ID: 36289589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel reference chart and growth standard of fetal biometry in the Taiwanese population.
    Huang TM; Tsai CH; Hung FY; Huang MC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 61(5):794-799. PubMed ID: 36088046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RE: Ultrasound and fetal size measurements in Brisbane, Australia.
    Mongelli M; Benzie R
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Oct; 49(5):441. PubMed ID: 16174192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ultrasound standards for head measurements are appropriate for use in the Zika epidemic: AGAINST: Current standards are inadequate.
    Saade GR
    BJOG; 2016 Jul; 123(8):1270. PubMed ID: 27150274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Report from the CFEF seminar on fetal biometry (June 2017)].
    Collège Français d'échographie Fœtale Cfef
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):545-551. PubMed ID: 29030147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.