These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36647263)

  • 1. Activity flow mapping over probabilistic functional connectivity.
    Zhu H; Huang Z; Yang Y; Su K; Fan M; Zou Y; Li T; Yin D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Feb; 44(2):341-361. PubMed ID: 36647263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Bassett DS; Schultz DH
    Nat Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 19(12):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 27723746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Cocuzza C; Sanchez-Romero R
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(12):2684-2702. PubMed ID: 33542083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Principal States of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reveal the Link Between Resting-State and Task-State Brain: An fMRI Study.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y; Sun J; Deng L; He N; Yang Y; Ling H; Ayaz H; Fu Y; Tong S
    Int J Neural Syst; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1850002. PubMed ID: 29607681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resting-State Network Topology Differentiates Task Signals across the Adult Life Span.
    Chan MY; Alhazmi FH; Park DC; Savalia NK; Wig GS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2734-2745. PubMed ID: 28174333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity.
    Glomb K; Ponce-Alvarez A; Gilson M; Ritter P; Deco G
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():388-402. PubMed ID: 28782678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest.
    Leonardi N; Richiardi J; Gschwind M; Simioni S; Annoni JM; Schluep M; Vuilleumier P; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():937-50. PubMed ID: 23872496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillation-Based Connectivity Architecture Is Dominated by an Intrinsic Spatial Organization, Not Cognitive State or Frequency.
    Mostame P; Sadaghiani S
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):179-192. PubMed ID: 33203739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-based co-activation patterns reliably predict resting state canonical network engagement during development.
    Ye F; Kohler R; Serio B; Lichenstein S; Yip SW
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 58():101160. PubMed ID: 36270101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional connectivity of intrinsic cognitive networks during resting state and task performance in preadolescent children.
    Jiang P; Vuontela V; Tokariev M; Lin H; Aronen ET; Ma Y; Carlson S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205690. PubMed ID: 30332489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Lag Patterns Differ Between Rest and Task Conditions, but Are Largely Typical in Autism.
    Mash LE; Linke AC; Gao Y; Wilkinson M; Olson MA; Jao Keehn RJ; Müller RA
    Brain Connect; 2022 Apr; 12(3):234-245. PubMed ID: 34102876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static and dynamic posterior cingulate cortex nodal topology of default mode network predicts attention task performance.
    Lin P; Yang Y; Jovicich J; De Pisapia N; Wang X; Zuo CS; Levitt JJ
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Mar; 10(1):212-25. PubMed ID: 25904156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic functional connectivity during task performance and rest predicts individual differences in attention across studies.
    Fong AHC; Yoo K; Rosenberg MD; Zhang S; Li CR; Scheinost D; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():14-25. PubMed ID: 30521950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Network-specific resting-state connectivity changes in the premotor-parietal axis in writer's cramp.
    Mantel T; Meindl T; Li Y; Jochim A; Gora-Stahlberg G; Kräenbring J; Berndt M; Dresel C; Haslinger B
    Neuroimage Clin; 2018; 17():137-144. PubMed ID: 29085775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased sensitivity to age-related differences in brain functional connectivity during continuous multiple object tracking compared to resting-state.
    Dørum ES; Kaufmann T; Alnæs D; Andreassen OA; Richard G; Kolskår KK; Nordvik JE; Westlye LT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Mar; 148():364-372. PubMed ID: 28111190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternating Diffusion Map Based Fusion of Multimodal Brain Connectivity Networks for IQ Prediction.
    Xiao L; Stephen JM; Wilson TW; Calhoun VD; Wang YP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Aug; 66(8):2140-2151. PubMed ID: 30507492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correspondence between evoked and intrinsic functional brain network configurations.
    Bolt T; Nomi JS; Rubinov M; Uddin LQ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1992-2007. PubMed ID: 28052450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disentangling dynamic networks: Separated and joint expressions of functional connectivity patterns in time.
    Leonardi N; Shirer WR; Greicius MD; Van De Ville D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Dec; 35(12):5984-95. PubMed ID: 25081921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of navigation network revealed by resting-state and task-state functional connectivity.
    Hao X; Huang T; Song Y; Kong X; Liu J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 243():118515. PubMed ID: 34454043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale intrinsic connectivity is consistent across varying task demands.
    Kieliba P; Madugula S; Filippini N; Duff EP; Makin TR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0213861. PubMed ID: 30970031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.