220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36648558)
1. Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.
Basulto-Martínez M; Proietti S; Pavia MP; Yeow Y; Eisner BH; Giusti G
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jan; 51(1):32. PubMed ID: 36648558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.
Blackmon RL; Irby PB; Fried NM
J Biomed Opt; 2011 Jul; 16(7):071403. PubMed ID: 21806249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on Soft Tissue: An
Doizi S; Germain T; Panthier F; Compérat E; Traxer O; Berthe L
J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 34409842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stone ablation efficacy: a comparison of a thulium fibre laser and two pulse-modulated holmium:YAG lasers.
Yang B; Ray A; Zhang JJ; Peng S; O'Brien M; Turney B
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jan; 51(1):31. PubMed ID: 36633683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ablation rates with Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser: Influence of the stone phantom homogeneity. An in vitro study.
Kutchukian S; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Germain T; Dragos L; Berthe L; Solano C; Candela L; Corrales M; Chicaud M; Traxer O; Panthier F
Prog Urol; 2023 Aug; 33(8-9):456-462. PubMed ID: 37442755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How Lasers Ablate Stones:
Taratkin M; Laukhtina E; Singla N; Tarasov A; Alekseeva T; Enikeev M; Enikeev D
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):931-936. PubMed ID: 31885281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser
Jiang P; Okhunov Z; Afyouni AS; Ali S; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Bhatt R; Brevik A; Ayad M; Larson K; Osann K; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2023 Mar; 37(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 36401505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Thermal Injury and Laser Efficiency with Holmium YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser-An
Sierra A; Corrales M; Kolvatzis M; Panthier F; Piñero A; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1599-1606. PubMed ID: 35793107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing dusting and fragmenting efficiency using the new SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser versus a 120 W Holmium:YAG laser.
Chew BH; Koo KC; Halawani A; Lundeen CJ; Knudsen BE; Molina WR
Investig Clin Urol; 2023 May; 64(3):265-271. PubMed ID: 37341006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.
Solano C; Corrales M; Panthier F; Candela L; Doizi S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2627-2636. PubMed ID: 37468656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ex vivo study of Ho:YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case?
Taratkin M; Kovalenko A; Laukhtina E; Paramonova N; Spivak L; Wachtendorf LJ; Eminovic S; Afyouni AS; Okhunov Z; Karagezyan M; Mikhailov V; Strakhov Y; Herrmann TR; Enikeev D
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Feb; 37(1):149-154. PubMed ID: 33175250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study.
Panthier F; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Chaussain C; Kogane N; Berthe L; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1683-1691. PubMed ID: 32253581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).
Taratkin M; Azilgareeva C; Petov V; Morozov A; Ali S; Babaevskaya D; De Coninck V; Korolev D; Akopyan G; Scoffone CM; Chinenov D; Androsov A; Fajkovic H; Lifshitz D; Traxer O; Enikeev D
World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3705-3711. PubMed ID: 37855897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus!
Sierra A; Corrales M; Piñero A; Kolvatzis M; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2313-2321. PubMed ID: 35933626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers.
Ventimiglia E; Doizi S; Kovalenko A; Andreeva V; Traxer O
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 32277557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How much energy do we need to ablate 1 cubic millimeter of stone during Thulium Fiber Laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study.
Panthier F; Chicaud M; Doizi S; Kutchukian S; Lapouge P; Solano C; Candela L; Daudon M; Berthe L; Corrales M; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):57. PubMed ID: 38280001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management.
Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Guseynov M; Andronov AS; Plekhanova OA
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 33238763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser Efficiency and Laser Safety: Holmium YAG vs. Thulium Fiber Laser.
Sierra A; Corrales M; Somani B; Traxer O
J Clin Med; 2022 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36614950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
Ulvik Ø; Æsøy MS; Juliebø-Jones P; Gjengstø P; Beisland C
Eur Urol; 2022 Jul; 82(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 35300888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
