These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36650364)

  • 1. Contrasting symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations in a joint classification task.
    Prpic V; Basamh YA; Goodridge CM; Agostini T; Murgia M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 36650364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Cleland AA; Corsico K; White K; Bull R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 31432745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
    Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial-numerical associations: Shared symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations.
    Buijsman S; Tirado C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2423-2436. PubMed ID: 30931820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
    Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers.
    Marinova M; Sasanguie D; Reynvoet B
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):764-776. PubMed ID: 31953564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mental Numerosity Line in the Human's Approximate Number System.
    Zhou X; Shen C; Li L; Li D; Cui J
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 63(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 27404985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated.
    He X; Guo P; Li S; Shen X; Zhou X
    Cogn Process; 2021 Aug; 22(3):475-486. PubMed ID: 33751283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SNARC Effect in Number Memorization and Retrieval. What is the Impact of Congruency, Magnitude and the Exact Position of Numbers in Short-Term Memory Processing?
    Gut M; Staniszewski R
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2016; 12(4):193-208. PubMed ID: 28154615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial Presentations, but Not Response Formats Influence Spatial-Numerical Associations in Adults.
    Fischer U; Huber S; Nuerk HC; Cress U; Moeller K
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2608. PubMed ID: 30619009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.